Are Meta smart glasses doomed to fail like Google Glass? Have your say on
what fate is most likely for wearable cameras

Date:
Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:19:48 +0000

Description:
There couldn't be a worse time for Meta and Samsung to release new smart glasses, but what could they do instead?

FULL STORY ======================================================================Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter As public perception continues to sour, and private businesses ban smart glasses from their events and premises, it feels like the writing might be on the wall for Metas Ray-Bans. At least as we know them.

Even without many laws changing, camera-equipped specs are becoming increasingly difficult to wear, especially if you dont want to be branded a perv or a creep. Because of this changing tide against Meta Ray-Bans and others, the most recent episode of the TechRadar podcast is a smart glasses special. Podcast regulars Josie, Axel and myself brought Toms Guides Jason England on board to discuss the issues facing smart specs and the risks they pose while also acknowledging how useful the tech can be when used appropriately. Latest Videos From TechRadar Watch full video here: Can smart glasses ever NOT be creepy? Why Meta, Apple, and Samsung want cameras on your face - YouTube Watch On We rounded things up with a quick discussion on what smart glasses could do to solve their privacy problems and clean up their public perception. I want to continue that chat here with you, our readers
and viewers.

Below Ill outline four possible paths forward, followed by a quick poll
asking you which path you believe we should take. You may like Meta just
fixed a big privacy vulnerability with its Ray-Ban smart glasses Forget Wetherspoons patchwork bans won't fix the Meta glasses' privacy crisis, so what comes next? The smart glasses backlash hits new heights as celebs and activists unite 1. Keep cameras in glasses (Image credit: Meta) If you are a smart glasses maker like Samsung , Meta or one of the many others, this would likely be your preferred approach: keep calm, and carry on churning out glasses with cameras (or AirPods if a recent Apple leak is to be believed).

The backlash against surveillance tech is at a fever pitch right now, but public outrage has a way of waxing and waning. Smart specs have been wildly popular before, who says they wont go back to being mega popular in a few months? Get daily insight, inspiration and deals in your inbox Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more. Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

This process could also be sped along by rolling out new privacy policies, or software which aims to mitigate the way smart specs with cameras are misused. If new useful features are released, marketing could also help to make smart glasses look more essential, and get their detractors to overlook the glaring privacy issues theyre so bothered about right now.

For current smart specs users it means their Meta Ray-Bans would still be completely usable, and fully functioning allowing them to rely on the first-person content capture capabilities for recording memories, informing their AI, or for accessible needs that the glasses are offering the visually impaired.

Its also unclear how effective a ban could be if it wasnt universal. What to read next Meta Ray-Ban Scriber Optics hands-on: superb 2026 smart glasses Please dont buy cheap Meta Ray-Ban alternatives heres why Here are the
places smart glasses are banned as privacy concerns grow

Countries like China already feature major public surveillance and tight regulation of what people can share online, so the downsides of camera
glasses arent as strongly felt there. As such theyre less likely to see a
ban. Bad actors could import glasses from countries where they are sold and attempt to dodge restrictions from brands who might not be as willing to address concerns as Meta has been with its various safety updates.

On the flip side, not banning features in some way means that the privacy issues persist plenty of folks could still be being recorded without their knowledge or consent. This could lead to serious public consequences if
people take action into their own hands, or heavy-handed legal consequences
if governments decide to ban smart glasses in all their forms to avoid any possible workarounds depriving us of the useful features XR specs could
offer in all aspects of our life (if the technology was allowed to develop). 2. Ban smart glasses outright (Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future) Rather than waiting and letting things continue before taking action, we could ban smart specs right now.

Of course this would limit access to the useful features they provide, and would see peoples purchases become paperweights, though it would tackle the privacy problems head on.

Ill address banning simply camera glasses below, but the one advantage of
this approach is it also hits glasses with microphones that could be used as
a form of covert surveillance technology. While audio is often less invasive than video or images, privacy advocates would argue any kind of surveillance is a terrible thing.

As I touched on above, removing smart specs entirely would deprive us of some potentially exceptionally useful and awesome tech that could provide benefits to our work, our ability to travel and communicate, and our play.

However, smart specs are also causing plenty of headaches. This approach
would make them all go away if it proves effective. 3. Ban cameras in glasses (Image credit: Future / Cas Kulk) A less heavy handed approach would be to merely ban cameras, but allow glasses with displays, speakers and/or microphones only to continue.

This would allow smart specs to offer audio or screen-based AI assistance, to play music, let you watch a TV or film, or perform a host of tasks that dont depend on computer vision.

Though a lack of cameras would limit the techs immediate usefulness quite considerably. Ive touched on this already, but the snapper can provide
context to the AI when you ask it questions about a landmark or sign you can see, it can offer hands-free recording capabilities many like to use while on vacation or while doing an action sport, and it has been used as an accessibility tool by the visually impaired to allow their smart specs to describe the world around them.

The advantage to smart spec makers is this approach could see them dodge an outright ban on glasses wearables cameras or not. It may also keep a door open for a safer camera-equipped version of smart glasses to materialize; a model that addresses the privacy concerns of the original.

Of course, this wouldnt remove the risks of covert audio recording posed by smart specs, though you could argue that the dangers posed by such recordings is less severe, especially since plenty of other accessible covert tools
(even a smartphone) could be used to privately record sound. 4. Keep the cameras, ban video recording (Image credit: Meta) The issue with camera glasses isnt necessarily that they can record, its that they can record relatively discreetly. While Metas glasses do have a recording light its easy to miss if you dont know to look for it.

For photos, an obvious solution would be to require the specs to play an audible camera snapping effect whenever a shot is captured. Metas specs can already do this, and it's a requirement of smartphone cameras already in countries like Japan.

Because Meta glasses dont have zoom capabilities you cant take useful photos from very far away, meaning an audible effect like this would be heard by anyone you attempt to photograph covertly. They could then confront you about being a creep in much the same way someone obviously taking photos with a phone or camera could be addressed in the moment.

Video is a little tougher to make obvious and still usable in the end result. An audible effect would need to play throughout the recording which could spoil the clips audio. An alternative could be to make the recording light brighter and have it pulse to make it a little more obvious, but it still may not be completely noticeable. So you could simply ban video recording with smart glasses.

This halfway house would allow the specs to sense the world around them facilitating AI and accessibility tools but could greatly restrict the harm they could cause.

The downside is hackers could modify the cameras to facilitate video
recording as all the hardware would still be there. That said, tamper-proof measures could mitigate this risk. Now its time to have your say. These four possibilities are somewhat simplistic, but I think they capture four general strategies we could deploy to solve our smart glasses problem. Let me know which you like best, or feel free to comment below with your thoughts! Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.



======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/computing/virtual-reality-augmented-reality/are-meta -smart-glasses-doomed-to-fail-like-google-glass-have-your-say-on-what-fate-is- most-likely-for-wearable-cameras


--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 (Linux/64)
* Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)