• AI is changing security testing, but not all vulnerabilities are

    From TechnologyDaily@1337:1/100 to All on Mon Aug 17 15:30:23 2026
    AI is changing security testing, but not all vulnerabilities are created equal

    Date:
    Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:24:55 +0000

    Description:
    AI is transforming vulnerability detection, yet expert-led hardware security testing remains indispensable.

    FULL STORY ======================================================================Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter Artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping cybersecurity. Much of the conversation has focused on how large language models are helping developers write code, but a more significant shift may be occurring elsewhere: security testing.

    AI systems are becoming remarkably effective at identifying vulnerabilities, forcing organizations to rethink how they evaluate the security of both software and hardware products. Dr. Axel York Poschmann Social Links Navigation

    Vice President of Product Security & Innovation at PQShield. The reason lies in the nature of modern software. Large codebases are sprawling ecosystems of interconnected modules, third-party dependencies, legacy components, and undocumented assumptions. Latest Videos From TechRadar Watch full video here:

    Security flaws often emerge not from a single defective function, but from subtle interactions between components that may be separated by hundreds of files or years of development history. Human reviewers excel at deep
    analysis, but they are constrained by time and cognitive bandwidth.

    AI systems, by contrast, can rapidly traverse vast amounts of code, correlate information across repositories, and identify patterns associated with known vulnerability classes. You may like Human-led, AI-assisted testing: Why AI wont replace penetration testers...yet. Companies need to focus on fixing exploitable vulnerabilities, not discovering as many as possible Why AI is accelerating old cyber risks, not creating new ones Common software
    weaknesses This capability is particularly powerful for common software weaknesses such as memory-safety issues, race conditions, authentication flaws, insecure API usage, and privilege-escalation paths. In many cases, AI is acting as an amplifier for established security techniques rather than inventing new ones. Yet the result is still significant: vulnerabilities that previously required substantial manual effort to uncover can now be
    identified at a much greater scale and speed.

    The implications for product security are profound. Organizations can no longer assume that obscure vulnerabilities will remain undiscovered because finding them is too expensive. The cost of vulnerability discovery is
    falling, and it is falling for defenders and attackers alike. Security
    testing therefore becomes less about achieving a point-in-time assessment and more about maintaining continuous assurance throughout the development lifecycle. Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter Sign up to the
    TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed! Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners
    or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms &
    Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

    However, it would be a mistake to assume that all areas of cybersecurity will be transformed equally by AI. Hardware security, particularly side-channel analysis of cryptographic implementations, presents a very different challenge.

    Unlike general-purpose software systems, cryptographic implementations
    operate within a comparatively narrow and mathematically defined problem space. Side-channel attacks do not typically exploit unexpected program behavior or complex interactions between software components. Instead, they target subtle information leakage through physical phenomena such as
    execution timing, power consumption, or electromagnetic emissions.

    The challenge is not understanding millions of lines of source code; it is extracting meaningful signals from carefully collected measurements and applying sophisticated statistical techniques to reveal hidden secrets. What to read next AI code security risk: The need for a smarter layer between detection and remediation The next evolution of the penetration test must include agentic AI Less than one in ten of cybersecurity pros trust AI
    testing tools to find vulnerabilities, with over three-quarters say their AI vulnerability scanning tools missed critical flaws Side-channel analysis This distinction matters because many of the strengths that make large language models effective in software security are less relevant in side-channel analysis. LLMs excel at connecting information across large bodies of text
    and code, identifying relationships that humans may overlook.

    Side-channel research, by contrast, already relies heavily on structured datasets, statistical processing, signal analysis, and deep domain expertise. AI can certainly accelerate parts of the workflowfrom automating experimentation to assisting with data interpretationbut the advantage is typically more incremental than transformational.

    That does not make hardware security less important. If anything, it highlights the need for specialized testing approaches. As AI lowers the barriers to software vulnerability discovery, organizations may be tempted to assume that automated tools alone can provide comprehensive assurance.

    The reality is that different classes of vulnerabilities require different forms of expertise. An AI-assisted code review may uncover a memory
    corruption bug, but it is unlikely to replace the specialist knowledge required to evaluate whether a cryptographic implementation leaks secrets through power analysis.

    The broader lesson is that security testing is becoming more important, not less. AI is increasing the speed at which vulnerabilities can be found, but
    it is not eliminating the need for expert analysis. Instead, it is changing where that expertise delivers the most value.

    Organizations that combine AI-assisted testing with rigorous human-led security evaluation will be best positioned to address the evolving threat landscapewhether the target is a cloud application, an embedded device, or
    the cryptographic hardware that underpins digital trust. We've reviewed, rated, and ranked the best internet security suites . This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives , our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

    The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit



    ======================================================================
    Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/pro/ai-is-changing-security-testing-but-not-all-vuln erabilities-are-created-equal


    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)