I used SCFG to edit my sub-boards for DOVE-Net, maximum messages =
9000, purge by age enabled at 9999 days old. duplicate checking with 10000 message CRC's.
started the bbs and it polls and pulls the QWK packet, and I watch the
log kick out duplicates - good, but then I see messages like this:
synchronet: evnt !Filtering QWK message from echicken due to age: 286 days
Of course, my system will likely be processing this packet for hours because it is a slow system with little RAM, but am I interpreting
that log message to mea n the message is not imported due to the age
of the message?
If so, do I assume the SCFG setting I mentioned only works on existing messages , and that there is some hard limit to importing messages?
I reset QWK pointers for bbs logon in an attempt to download lots of historical messages. (1/1/1980 )
I used SCFG to edit my sub-boards for DOVE-Net, maximum messages = 9000, purge by age enabled at 9999 days old. duplicate checking with 10000 message CRC's.
started the bbs and it polls and pulls the QWK packet, and I watch the log kick out duplicates - good, but then I see messages like this:
synchronet: evnt !Filtering QWK message from echicken due to age: 286 days
Of course, my system will likely be processing this packet for hours because it is a slow system with little RAM, but am I interpreting that log message to mea n the message is not imported due to the age of the message?
If so, do I assume the SCFG setting I mentioned only works on existing messages , and that there is some hard limit to importing messages?
Accession wrote to Hemo <=-
Hello Hemo,
On 07 Dec 16 13:00, Hemo wrote to digital man:
I used SCFG to edit my sub-boards for DOVE-Net, maximum messages =
9000, purge by age enabled at 9999 days old. duplicate checking with 10000 message CRC's.
started the bbs and it polls and pulls the QWK packet, and I watch the
log kick out duplicates - good, but then I see messages like this:
synchronet: evnt !Filtering QWK message from echicken due to age: 286 days
Of course, my system will likely be processing this packet for hours because it is a slow system with little RAM, but am I interpreting
that log message to mea n the message is not imported due to the age
of the message?
If so, do I assume the SCFG setting I mentioned only works on existing messages , and that there is some hard limit to importing messages?
I believe you will receive all messages, and smbutil's message
maintenance (See default timed events) will filter out the old messages and messages over maximum per sub-board once it runs. Or you could run
it manually with the proper options.
There is a separate setting for the maximum age of messages imported via QWK
SCFG->Message Options->Maximum QWK Message Age
I believe you will receive all messages, and smbutil's message maintenance (See default timed events) will filter out the old messages and messages over maximum per sub-board once it runs. Or you could run it manually with the proper options.
I was also wondering about that. guess I'll sit back and let the processes finish up and then take another look.
I'm also seeing some messages along the lines of:
synchronet: evnt ERROR 2 (No such file or directory) in qwk.cpp line 1185 (qwk_vote) writing "/sbbs/data/subs/dove-syncdisc" access=1 info=
and I'm not sure what it is looking for. those folders did not originally exists, but even after creating them I see messages related to no such file or directory.
I was also wondering about that. guess I'll sit back and let the processes finish up and then take another look.
I'm also seeing some messages along the lines of:
synchronet: evnt ERROR 2 (No such file or directory) in qwk.cpp line
1185 (qwk_vote) writing "/sbbs/data/subs/dove-syncdisc" access=1 info=
and I'm not sure what it is looking for. those folders did not
originally exists, but even after creating them I see messages related
to no such file or directory.
I'm also seeing some messages along the lines of:
synchronet: evnt ERROR 2 (No such file or directory) in qwk.cpp
line 1185 (qwk_vote) writing "/sbbs/data/subs/dove-syncdisc"
access=1 info=
and I'm not sure what it is looking for. those folders did not
originally exists, but even after creating them I see messages
related to no such file or directory.
That error message is only useful to someone with the source code unfortunately, but I can tell you that it means that the "vote"
message in the QWK packet was a duplicate and thus rejected. That's
all. The "ERROR 2 (...)" part can be ignored.
Hello Hemo,
On 07 Dec 16 19:18, Hemo wrote to Accession:
I was also wondering about that. guess I'll sit back and let the
processes finish up and then take another look.
Now that it's the next day, did it do anything useful for you?
I'm also seeing some messages along the lines of:
synchronet: evnt ERROR 2 (No such file or directory) in qwk.cpp line
1185 (qwk_vote) writing "/sbbs/data/subs/dove-syncdisc" access=1
info=
I'm seeing this error as well, and as of now am unsure what it means. Glad to see you posted about it here, though.. as I asked DM about it via IRC. So at least an answer here will give more than just me the response. :)
and I'm not sure what it is looking for. those folders did not
originally exists, but even after creating them I see messages
related to no such file or directory.
From the error message, it looks like it has something to do with the new voting process DM is working on. Though I don't know if it's something that needs to be worried about or not just yet.
Hello Digital,
On 07 Dec 16 17:23, Digital Man wrote to Hemo:
I'm also seeing some messages along the lines of:
synchronet: evnt ERROR 2 (No such file or directory) in qwk.cpp
line 1185 (qwk_vote) writing "/sbbs/data/subs/dove-syncdisc"
access=1 info=
and I'm not sure what it is looking for. those folders did not
originally exists, but even after creating them I see messages
related to no such file or directory.
That error message is only useful to someone with the source code unfortunately, but I can tell you that it means that the "vote"
message in the QWK packet was a duplicate and thus rejected. That's all. The "ERROR 2 (...)" part can be ignored.
Thanks for that. Disregard my PM on IRC about the same subject. :)
With that said, and if this is going to start to happen often, is it also something that could be logged as a warning instead (it also appears in error.log)?
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495935:27:57 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,933 |