Here's sort of my plan and current state:
1. SMBLIB/SMBUTIL/CHKSMB/FIXSMB updated for filebases, done
2. FILELIST utility updated, done
3. ADDFILES utility updated, in-progress
4. DELFILES utility updated, to-do
5. SBBS internal file access functions updated, in-progress
6. New JS FileBase class, to-do
7. FTP server update, to-do
7. Update any legacy JS or other mods that access the old filebases, to-do
- No more artificial limits on the length of file descriptions
- No more 32-bit (4GB) credit/file-length limit
- Discussion threads on uploaded files may be possible
- Up/down voting on uploaded files may be possible
- More file list sorting options
- Faster file name/description searching and listing
On 07-17-18 02:02, Digital Man wrote to All <=-
(or as I would usually write, "Long filename support").
The obvious improvement will be with the stored filenames and some issues with the old 8.3->long filename resolutions on Windows will go away as well (in some cases, the Micros~1 shortened filename can change even though the long filename did not).
However, this will address other "issues" and pave the way to cool new features:
- No more artificial limits on the length of file descriptions
- No more 32-bit (4GB) credit/file-length limit
- Discussion threads on uploaded files may be possible
- Up/down voting on uploaded files may be possible
- More file list sorting options
- Faster file name/description searching and listing
I know that file transfers are not a major motivating factor for BBS users these days, but still, it's something we have and use and I want it to work better (like you). So that's what I'm working on and would be happy to discuss your ideas or concerns.
well will there be a program to convert from old file system to new file system?
- No more 32-bit (4GB) credit/file-length limit
what you mean by this? you mean will be 2 version of sbbs for 32 bit and
64 bit?
A JavaScript interface to the file areas is one thing I think has been missing from Synchronet, and I think that would be good to have (along with the long filename support).
(or as I would usually write, "Long filename support").
filebase.- No more 32-bit (4GB) credit/file-length limit
what you mean by this? you mean will be 2 version of sbbs for 32 bit and
64 bit?
No. It means that files that are larger than 4GB can be added to the
Now, transferring those files via traditional ZMODEM won't be possible(ZMODEM
has a 32-bit file size limitation), but transferring via FTP and other protocols should be fine.
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Digital Man wrote:
- No more 32-bit (4GB) credit/file-length limit
what you mean by this? you mean will be 2 version of sbbs for 32 bit and 64 bit?
No. It means that files that are larger than 4GB can be added to the filebase.
Now, transferring those files via traditional ZMODEM won't be possible (ZMODEM
has a 32-bit file size limitation), but transferring via FTP and other protocols should be fine.
sp if a user try to use zmodem, etc that limits to 32bit file size, it
will block from using it and ask to use ftp and other protocols?
I was originally planning on waiting for SBBS v4 to roll-out the filebase replacement, but I changed my mind and have been prodded into working on "sooner" than that by some persistent sbbs/Linux sysop(s) - and I agree: it's long overdue and more urgent than most of the other v4-slated changes.
I was originally planning on waiting for SBBS v4 to roll-out the
filebase replacement, but I changed my mind and have been prodded into
working on "sooner" than that by some persistent sbbs/Linux sysop(s) -
and I agree: it's long overdue and more urgent than most of the other
v4-slated changes.
Really?
Re: Re: Long file name supportfilename
By: Nelgin to Digital Man on Sat Jul 21 2018 02:41 am
I was originally planning on waiting for SBBS v4 to roll-out the
filebase replacement, but I changed my mind and have been prodded into
working on "sooner" than that by some persistent sbbs/Linux sysop(s) -
and I agree: it's long overdue and more urgent than most of the other
v4-slated changes.
Really?
I think I would agree with DM. Even with Synchronet for Windows, long
support seems incomplete. It displays the 8.3-format filename on the left, though it displays the long filename on the right. And a JavaScriptinterface
to the file areas is basically missing in Synchronet (echicken and Deuce have created JavaScript libraries to add some level of JS support, but it's not something that is built into Synchronet yet).
Digital wrote:
I was originally planning on waiting for SBBS v4 to roll-out the filebase replacement, but I changed my mind and have been prodded into working on "sooner" than that by some persistent sbbs/Linux sysop(s) - and I agree: it's long overdue and more urgent than most of the other v4-slated changes.
Really?
- temp file directory (extraction of archives, viewing embedded files,
- QWK-based file requests / attachments
Re: Long file name support
By: Digital Man to All on Tue Jul 24 2018 02:08 am
- temp file directory (extraction of archives, viewing embedded files,
I've wondered if it would be possible to view text files within an archive from the file listing view?
- QWK-based file requests / attachments
I'd hate to loose this feature but files are easily available from the transfer menu or ftp these days so it's probably not used as much as it has been in the past.
I'd hate to loose this feature but files are easily available from the
transfer menu or ftp these days so it's probably not used as much as
it has been in the past.
Are you using that feature?
- temp file directory (extraction of archives, viewing embedded files, etc.)
Re: Long file name support
By: Digital Man to All on Tue Jul 24 2018 02:08 am
- temp file directory (extraction of archives, viewing embedded files, etc.)
This would be a shame to lose permanently. It's not something I use often, but it is something I've used in the past and likely would again.
On 07-24-18 05:24, Al wrote to Digital Man <=-
Re: Long file name support
By: Digital Man to Al on Tue Jul 24 2018 04:21 am
I'd hate to loose this feature but files are easily available from the
transfer menu or ftp these days so it's probably not used as much as
it has been in the past.
Are you using that feature?
Not these days no. I have used it in the past when you could never be
sure when you would get a connection with a BBS and online time was limited.
We might be past those days now.. :)
Re: Long file name support
By: Digital Man to All on Tue Jul 24 2018 02:08:58
Wow, really looking forward to this...
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495940:28:10 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,978 |