Mojo wrote to All on 03-29-18 14:22 <=-
Is anyone having trouble with the FTP server portion of Synchronet becoming busy often?
Mine will become busy for some reason and it send my system into 100% processor usage. I have to end task on the all of it in order to get it
to stop. From the FTP window I can not stop it or anything the only to regain control is to end task on it. Anyone have any ideas as to why
this may be happening?
Is anyone having trouble with the FTP server portion of Synchronet becoming busy often?
Mine will become busy for some reason and it send my system into 100% processor usage. I have to end task on the all of it in order to get it to stop. From the FTP window I can not stop it or anything the only to regain control is to end task on it. Anyone have any ideas as to why this may be happening?
Is anyone having trouble with the FTP server portion of Synchronet becoming busy often?
Mine will become busy for some reason and it send my system into 100% processor usage. I have to end task on the all of it in order to get it to stop. From the FTP window I can not stop it or anything the only to regain control is to end task on it. Anyone have any ideas as to why this may be happening?
Mojo
In the FTP terminal window, are you getting excessive connect tries? I just tried mine remotely and I didn't go over 8% CPU usage with everything in the background running as well.
I think I found where the problem was at with the FTP server. I had a system checking for messages on my system and there system was hitting mine every minute to two minutes and it was connecting constantly one right after the other and my system was having a hard time with this. I
I think some (one?) of the recent enhancements to the FTP server have introduced a/some new bugs.
Re: FTP Server
By: Digital Man to Mojo on Thu Mar 29 2018 05:44 pm
I think some (one?) of the recent enhancements to the FTP server have introduced a/some new bugs.
Well so much for thinking I found the problem. It is still doing this where it becomes busy. I did not even have anyone connected to it. But it shows it is busy. When I try to stop the service it won't even stop I have to bring up the task manager and end task on sbbsctrl.exe it order to get it to stop. So I am not sure now what is going on with it.
I think I found where the problem was at with the FTP server. I had
a system checking for messages on my system and there system was
hitting mine every minute to two minutes and it was connecting
constantly one right after the other and my system was having a hard
time with this. I
Still, I doubt that should normally cause the CPU usage to get near 100%.
It's a relatively new bug introduced with the FTP-TLS feature. Supposedly, it was fixed in FTP Server rev 1.465. What revision are you running?
Re: FTP Server
By: Digital Man to Mojo on Fri Mar 30 2018 03:50 pm
It's a relatively new bug introduced with the FTP-TLS feature. Supposedly, it was fixed in FTP Server rev 1.465. What revision are you running?
At this time as of the update I did on 3-29-18 I am running rev 1.464
Well so much for thinking I found the problem. It is still doing this where it becomes busy. I did not even have anyone connected to it. But it shows it is busy. When I try to stop the service it won't even stop I have to bring up the task manager and end task on sbbsctrl.exe it order to get it to stop. So I am not sure now what is going on with it.
At this time as of the update I did on 3-29-18 I am running rev 1.464
Right, so you need to update again. :-)
Have you rebuilt Synchronet lately, Rob suggested it was a bug, and Duece fixed a bug in the TLS feature a few days ago..
Have you rebuilt Synchronet lately, Rob suggested it was a bug, and
Duece fixed a bug in the TLS feature a few days ago..
Why would I need to rebuild it?
I have an issue with another sysop trying to poll for packets.
they are running a script to poll packets and is not able to poll packets. the ftp server just hangs up and does nothing.
When I connect to the server and manually type in commands pull or get it responds with command not supported. Is the script supported anymore in the newer versions of SBBS or do I have to run the qnet functions in the qwk setup in sconfig?
Re: FTP ServerI am sorry wrong wording.
By: Lord Blackfair to All on Wed Sep 09 2020 08:39 am
I have an issue with another sysop trying to poll for packets.
they are running a script to poll packets and is not able to poll packets. the ftp server just hangs up and does nothing.
When I connect to the server and manually type in commands pull or get it responds with command not supported. Is the script supported anymore in the newer versions of SBBS or do I have to run the qnet functions in the qwk setup in sconfig?
What script are you referring to?
Re: FTP Server
By: Digital Man to Lord Blackfair on Wed Sep 09 2020 01:07 pm
Re: FTP Server
By: Lord Blackfair to All on Wed Sep 09 2020 08:39 am
I have an issue with another sysop trying to poll for packets.
they are running a script to poll packets and is not able to poll packets. the ftp server just hangs up and does nothing.
When I connect to the server and manually type in commands pull or get it responds with command not supported. Is the script supported anymore in the newer versions of SBBS or do I have to run the qnet functions in the qwk setup in sconfig?
What script are you referring to?I am sorry wrong wording.
open blackf.synchro.net
user name
password
put c:\sbbs\data\blackf.rep blackf.rep
get blackf.qwk c:\sbbs\data\blackf.qwk
quit
Re: FTP Server
Okay, and you'd need an FTP client that supported those commands. What FTP client are you (or is this other sysop) using?
Re: FTP Server
By: Digital Man to Keith Cunningham on Wed Sep 09 2020 05:55 pm
Re: FTP ServerFTP
Okay, and you'd need an FTP client that supported those commands. What
client are you (or is this other sysop) using?
this is the logs that i have. they cant grab qwk packets
and send .rep packets.
07:58:31 10212 <100.34.95.13> RX: USER B****
07:58:31 10212 TX: 331 User name okay, need password.
07:58:31 10212 <100.34.95.13> RX: PASS *****
07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> logged in (4 today, 11716 total)
07:58:31 10212 TX: 230-Battlest logged in.
07:58:31 10212 TX: 230-You have 14680064 download credits.
07:58:31 10212 TX: 230 You are allowed 546 minutes of use for this session. 07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> RX: TYPE I
07:58:31 10212 TX: 200 All files sent in BINARY mode.
07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> RX: PASV
07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA socket 9376 opened
07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA trying to bind socket to port 1024 07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA socket 9376 bound to port 1024
07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA IP address in response: 10.0.0.25 (subject to NAT)
07:58:31 10212 TX: 227 Entering Passive Mode (10,0,0,25,4,0)
07:58:52 10212 <Battlest> RX: TYPE I
07:58:52 10212 TX: 200 All files sent in BINARY mode.
07:58:52 10212 <Battlest> RX: PASV
07:58:52 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA socket 9376 opened
07:58:52 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA trying to bind socket to port 1024 07:58:52 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA socket 9376 bound to port 1024
07:58:52 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA IP address in response: 10.0.0.25 (subject to NAT)
07:58:52 10212 TX: 227 Entering Passive Mode (10,0,0,25,4,0)
07:59:13 10212 <Battlest> RX: QUIT
07:59:13 10212 TX: 221 Goodbye. Closing control connection.
07:59:13 10212 <Battlest> logged off
Re: FTP ServerSep 09 2020 09:43 pm
By: Lord Blackfair to Digital Man on Wed
on Wed Sep 09 2020 05:55 pmRe: FTP Server
By: Digital Man to Keith Cunningham
that supported those commands. WhatRe: FTP Server
Okay, and you'd need an FTP client
sysop) using?FTP
client are you (or is this other
cant grab qwk packetsthis is the logs that i have. they
USER B****and send .rep packets.
07:58:31 10212 <100.34.95.13> RX:
need password.07:58:31 10212 TX: 331 User name okay,
*****07:58:31 10212 <100.34.95.13> RX: PASS
today, 11716 total)07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> logged in (4
in.07:58:31 10212 TX: 230-Battlest logged
14680064 download credits.07:58:31 10212 TX: 230-You have
546 minutes of use for this07:58:31 10212 TX: 230 You are allowed
TYPE Isession. 07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> RX:
in BINARY mode.07:58:31 10212 TX: 200 All files sent
socket 9376 opened07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> RX: PASV
07:58:31 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA
trying to bind socket to port 102407:58:31 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA
socket 9376 bound to port 102407:58:31 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA
address in response: 10.0.0.2507:58:31 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA IP
Passive Mode (10,0,0,25,4,0)(subject to NAT)
07:58:31 10212 TX: 227 Entering
in BINARY mode.07:58:52 10212 <Battlest> RX: TYPE I
07:58:52 10212 TX: 200 All files sent
socket 9376 opened07:58:52 10212 <Battlest> RX: PASV
07:58:52 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA
trying to bind socket to port 102407:58:52 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA
socket 9376 bound to port 102407:58:52 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA
address in response: 10.0.0.2507:58:52 10212 <Battlest> PASV DATA IP
Passive Mode (10,0,0,25,4,0)(subject to NAT)
07:58:52 10212 TX: 227 Entering
Closing control connection.07:59:13 10212 <Battlest> RX: QUIT
07:59:13 10212 TX: 221 Goodbye.
contents you posted here.07:59:13 10212 <Battlest> logged off
So the sender sent:
USER
PASS
TYPE I
PASV
TYPE I
PASV
QUIT
... doesn't seem to match the script
digital man
Sling Blade quote #3:just plum near cut his head in
Karl (re: killing Doyle): That second one
two. Norco, CA WX: 73.7oF, 52.0% humidity,4 mph E wind, 0.00 inches
rain/24hrsSynchronet * [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
---
* Synchronet * Vertrauen * Home of
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495940:29:18 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,978 |