I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a
switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed
netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the
HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.
Accession wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-04-17 06:29 <=-
On Fri Mar 03 2017 21:10:20, Bill McGarrity wrote to Digital Man:
I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a
switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed
netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the
HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.
If there is no link information for that address, and no route
information (whether it be a wildcard or direct), it will not go
anywhere. For example, if you receive a routed netmail for 123:456/789, you would either have to have a direct link setup for that node, or a wildcard (ie: 123:ALL routed to 123:1/1).
Take a look at the destination address of the netmail stuck in your netmail folder, and make sure you have it routed somewhere, or if you
have a direct connection to it, that there be a direct setup for that specific address.
If it's a point, and you have a direct link setup with the boss node,
you have to change that direct link to the boss node to actually route
the points under it to it also.
Hiya DM...
I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch
or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-05-17 17:50 <=-
Re: Routed netmail
By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm
Hiya DM...
I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch
or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.
Is the destination address one of your links?
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-05-17 17:50 <=-
Re: Routed netmail
By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm
Hiya DM...
I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.
Is the destination address one of your links?
Yes...
All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 09:53 <=-
Re: Routed netmail
By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Sun Mar 05 2017 11:46 pm
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-05-17 17:50 <=-
Re: Routed netmail
By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm
Hiya DM...
I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.
Is the destination address one of your links?
Yes...
All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.
And "HUB" is where the netmail message is currently sitting? If so,
just running 'sbbsecho' with no argument should packetize and export it unless it has some attribute flag preventing it (e.g. local, sent).
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 09:53 <=-
Re: Routed netmail
By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Sun Mar 05 2017 11:46 pm
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-05-17 17:50 <=-
Re: Routed netmail
By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm
Hiya DM...
I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.
Is the destination address one of your links?
Yes...
All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.
And "HUB" is where the netmail message is currently sitting? If so, just running 'sbbsecho' with no argument should packetize and export it unless it has some attribute flag preventing it (e.g. local, sent).
As per the log, it has an 'Already Sent" flag set.
I tried using the -j switch and still the same
Why was it originally received and not resent to
the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?
The '-j' switch has no effect in SBBSecho v3 (run "sbbsecho -h" for the command-line help).
All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.
And "HUB" is where the netmail message is currently sitting? If so, just running 'sbbsecho' with no argument should packetize and export it unless it has some attribute flag preventing it (e.g. local, sent).
As per the log, it has an 'Already Sent" flag set.
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 13:10 <=-
Re: Routed netmail
By: Digital Man to Bill McGarrity on Mon Mar 06 2017 01:09 pm
The '-j' switch has no effect in SBBSecho v3 (run "sbbsecho -h" for the command-line help).
Make that "sbbsecho -?". "sbbsecho -h" actually does something else.
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 13:09 <=-
Why was it originally received and not resent to
the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?
If you want to route mail between linked-nodes, yes, you need route-to statements to that effect.
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 13:09 <=-
Why was it originally received and not resent to
the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?
If you want to route mail between linked-nodes, yes, you need route-to statements to that effect.
OK.. guessing here.... but could I use: Route-To 24:24/1 24:All
And just add it to the sbbsecho.ini file at the bottom?
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 22:27 <=-
Re: Routed netmail
By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Mon Mar 06 2017 05:21 pm
Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 13:09 <=-
Why was it originally received and not resent to
the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?
If you want to route mail between linked-nodes, yes, you need route-to statements to that effect.
OK.. guessing here.... but could I use: Route-To 24:24/1 24:All
And just add it to the sbbsecho.ini file at the bottom?
No, that's not the syntax. Something like this would work however:
[node:24:ALL]
Route = 24:24/1
Or just use echocfg and add the "24:ALL" node in echocfg->Linked Nodes with "Route To" set to 24:24/1.
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495931:29:23 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,892 |