• Routed netmail

    From Bill McGarrity@1:266/404 to Digital Man on Fri Mar 3 21:10:20 2017
    Hiya DM...

    I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch
    or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have
    one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.

    Thanks...


    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:81
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: 6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live

    ... Look TWICE.... Save a life.... Motorcycles are EVERYWHERE!!
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
  • From Accession@1:103/705 to Bill McGarrity on Sat Mar 4 06:29:24 2017
    Hello Bill,

    On Fri Mar 03 2017 21:10:20, Bill McGarrity wrote to Digital Man:

    I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a
    switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed
    netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the
    HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.

    If there is no link information for that address, and no route information (whether it be a wildcard or direct), it will not go anywhere. For example, if you receive a routed netmail for 123:456/789, you would either have to have a direct link setup for that node, or a wildcard (ie: 123:ALL routed to 123:1/1).

    Take a look at the destination address of the netmail stuck in your netmail folder, and make sure you have it routed somewhere, or if you have a direct connection to it, that there be a direct setup for that specific address.

    If it's a point, and you have a direct link setup with the boss node, you have to change that direct link to the boss node to actually route the points under it to it also.

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... "-Y-| -+-+-#-A. -> -+-|-|-U-i -e-+-+-i-|-+ -C-#-#-+-e-#-A."
    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20170303
    # Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (723:1/1)
    * Synchronet * thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
    * Origin: Vertrauen - vert.synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Bill McGarrity@1:266/404 to Accession on Sat Mar 4 17:43:00 2017
    Hiya Nick..

    Accession wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-04-17 06:29 <=-


    On Fri Mar 03 2017 21:10:20, Bill McGarrity wrote to Digital Man:

    I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a
    switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed
    netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the
    HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.

    If there is no link information for that address, and no route
    information (whether it be a wildcard or direct), it will not go
    anywhere. For example, if you receive a routed netmail for 123:456/789, you would either have to have a direct link setup for that node, or a wildcard (ie: 123:ALL routed to 123:1/1).

    I have a direct link setup in echocfg to all my downlinks. The netmail came in from 24:110/1 and was addressed to me at 24:100/1. The HUB has both addresses as linked nodes.

    Take a look at the destination address of the netmail stuck in your netmail folder, and make sure you have it routed somewhere, or if you
    have a direct connection to it, that there be a direct setup for that specific address.

    If it's a point, and you have a direct link setup with the boss node,
    you have to change that direct link to the boss node to actually route
    the points under it to it also.

    It's not a point.


    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:81
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!!
    === MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
  • From Digital Man@1:103/705 to Bill McGarrity on Sun Mar 5 17:50:36 2017
    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm

    Hiya DM...

    I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch
    or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.

    Is the destination address one of your links?

    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #71:
    The largest dial-up Synchronet BBS was The Easy Street BBS with 25 nodes/lines. Norco, CA WX: 52.7oF, 75.0% humidity, 6 mph N wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: Vertrauen - vert.synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Bill McGarrity@1:266/404 to Digital Man on Sun Mar 5 23:46:00 2017
    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-05-17 17:50 <=-

    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm

    Hiya DM...

    I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch
    or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.

    Is the destination address one of your links?

    Yes...

    All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.


    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:81
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!!
    === MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
  • From Digital Man@1:103/705 to Bill McGarrity on Mon Mar 6 09:53:50 2017
    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Sun Mar 05 2017 11:46 pm

    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-05-17 17:50 <=-

    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm

    Hiya DM...

    I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.

    Is the destination address one of your links?

    Yes...

    All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.

    And "HUB" is where the netmail message is currently sitting? If so, just running 'sbbsecho' with no argument should packetize and export it unless it has some attribute flag preventing it (e.g. local, sent).

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #17:
    DSL = Digital Subscriber Line
    Norco, CA WX: 55.2oF, 56.0% humidity, 0 mph NW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: Vertrauen - vert.synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Bill McGarrity@1:266/404 to Digital Man on Mon Mar 6 15:03:00 2017
    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 09:53 <=-

    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Sun Mar 05 2017 11:46 pm

    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-05-17 17:50 <=-

    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm

    Hiya DM...

    I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.

    Is the destination address one of your links?

    Yes...

    All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.

    And "HUB" is where the netmail message is currently sitting? If so,
    just running 'sbbsecho' with no argument should packetize and export it unless it has some attribute flag preventing it (e.g. local, sent).

    As per the log, it has an 'Already Sent" flag set. I tried using the -j switch and still the same Why was it originally received and not resent to the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?

    Here's the log running ./sbbsecho without any switches..

    ***** Start LOG


    SBBSecho v3.00-Linux (rev 3.30) - Synchronet FidoNet EchoMail Tosser



    Loading configuration files from /home/pi/sbbs/ctrl/

    SBBSecho 3.00-Linux r3.30 Mar 1 2017 GCC 4.9.2 invoked with options:

    Reading /home/pi/sbbs/data/areas.bbs

    Read 97 areas from /home/pi/sbbs/data/areas.bbs



    Scanning /home/pi/sbbs/temp/sbbsecho/ for Stray Outbound Packets...



    Scanning for Inbound Packets...

    Scanning secure inbound: /home/pi/sbbs/sportnet/secure/

    Scanning non-secure inbound: /home/pi/sbbs/sportnet/inbound/



    Scanning for Inbound NetMail Messages...

    /home/pi/sbbs/netmail/1.msg Eric Renfro (24:110/1) To: Bill McGarrity (24:100/1) Foreign address



    Scanning for Outbound EchoMail...

    Scanning 1generals -> GENERAL_SPORTSNET_CHAT


    Exporting Outbound NetMail from /home/pi/sbbs/data/mail to /home/pi/sbbs/netmail/*.msg ...



    Packing Outbound NetMail from /home/pi/sbbs/netmail/*.msg ...
    NetMail msg 1.msg from Eric Renfro (24:110/1) to Bill McGarrity (24:100/1): already sent


    Deleting /home/pi/sbbs/ctrl/sbbsecho.bsy (from line 2297)

    ***** End LOG

    Another thing, why would it report 'foreign address' when it's in sbbsecho.ini as a linked node.

    Thanks..



    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:81
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!!
    === MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
  • From Digital Man@1:103/705 to Bill McGarrity on Mon Mar 6 13:09:04 2017
    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Mon Mar 06 2017 03:03 pm

    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 09:53 <=-

    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Sun Mar 05 2017 11:46 pm

    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-05-17 17:50 <=-

    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm

    Hiya DM...

    I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address.

    Is the destination address one of your links?

    Yes...

    All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.

    And "HUB" is where the netmail message is currently sitting? If so, just running 'sbbsecho' with no argument should packetize and export it unless it has some attribute flag preventing it (e.g. local, sent).

    As per the log, it has an 'Already Sent" flag set.

    And that's why it's not being sent.

    I tried using the -j switch and still the same

    The '-j' switch has no effect in SBBSecho v3 (run "sbbsecho -h" for the command-line help). Even in SBBSecho v2, the '-j' option would do nothing in regards to the 'Sent' attribute.

    Why was it originally received and not resent to
    the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?

    If you want to route mail between linked-nodes, yes, you need route-to statements to that effect.

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #1:
    ANSI = American National Standards Institute
    Norco, CA WX: 62.5oF, 28.0% humidity, 0 mph SE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: Vertrauen - vert.synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Digital Man@1:103/705 to Bill McGarrity on Mon Mar 6 13:10:50 2017
    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Digital Man to Bill McGarrity on Mon Mar 06 2017 01:09 pm

    The '-j' switch has no effect in SBBSecho v3 (run "sbbsecho -h" for the command-line help).

    Make that "sbbsecho -?". "sbbsecho -h" actually does something else.


    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #47:
    The Synchronet Museum is online at http://wiki.synchro.net/history:museum: Norco, CA WX: 62.5oF, 28.0% humidity, 0 mph SE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: Vertrauen - vert.synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Digital Man@1:103/705 to Bill McGarrity on Mon Mar 6 13:21:22 2017
    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Mon Mar 06 2017 03:03 pm

    All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.

    And "HUB" is where the netmail message is currently sitting? If so, just running 'sbbsecho' with no argument should packetize and export it unless it has some attribute flag preventing it (e.g. local, sent).

    As per the log, it has an 'Already Sent" flag set.

    Is it possible it was actually already sent (hence the 'Already Sent' flag) and it's only still sitting there becuase you have or had DeleteNetmail disabled in your sbbsecho.ini file?

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #55:
    XON = Transmit On (ASCII 17, Ctrl-Q)
    Norco, CA WX: 61.6oF, 29.0% humidity, 0 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: Vertrauen - vert.synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Bill McGarrity@1:266/404 to Digital Man on Mon Mar 6 17:40:00 2017
    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 13:10 <=-

    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Digital Man to Bill McGarrity on Mon Mar 06 2017 01:09 pm

    The '-j' switch has no effect in SBBSecho v3 (run "sbbsecho -h" for the command-line help).

    Make that "sbbsecho -?". "sbbsecho -h" actually does something else.


    OK... that actually helped. Found out what the -g switch does... great idea for a monthly update to all the nodes. :)


    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:81
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!!
    === MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
  • From Bill McGarrity@1:103/705 to Digital Man on Mon Mar 6 17:21:00 2017
    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 13:09 <=-


    Why was it originally received and not resent to
    the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?

    If you want to route mail between linked-nodes, yes, you need route-to statements to that effect.

    OK.. guessing here.... but could I use: Route-To 24:24/1 24:All

    And just add it to the sbbsecho.ini file at the bottom?

    Thanks..


    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:81
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!!
    --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    * Synchronet * TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ
    * Origin: Vertrauen - vert.synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Digital Man@1:103/705 to Bill McGarrity on Mon Mar 6 22:27:20 2017
    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Mon Mar 06 2017 05:21 pm

    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 13:09 <=-


    Why was it originally received and not resent to
    the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?

    If you want to route mail between linked-nodes, yes, you need route-to statements to that effect.

    OK.. guessing here.... but could I use: Route-To 24:24/1 24:All

    And just add it to the sbbsecho.ini file at the bottom?

    No, that's not the syntax. Something like this would work however:

    [node:24:ALL]
    Route = 24:24/1

    Or just use echocfg and add the "24:ALL" node in echocfg->Linked Nodes with "Route To" set to 24:24/1.

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #51:
    TCP = Transmission Control Protocol
    Norco, CA WX: 48.9oF, 65.0% humidity, 0 mph W wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: Vertrauen - vert.synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Bill McGarrity@1:266/404 to Digital Man on Tue Mar 7 10:44:00 2017
    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 22:27 <=-

    Re: Routed netmail
    By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Mon Mar 06 2017 05:21 pm

    Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 13:09 <=-


    Why was it originally received and not resent to
    the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?

    If you want to route mail between linked-nodes, yes, you need route-to statements to that effect.

    OK.. guessing here.... but could I use: Route-To 24:24/1 24:All

    And just add it to the sbbsecho.ini file at the bottom?

    No, that's not the syntax. Something like this would work however:

    [node:24:ALL]
    Route = 24:24/1

    Or just use echocfg and add the "24:ALL" node in echocfg->Linked Nodes with "Route To" set to 24:24/1.

    Thank you!!


    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:81
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!!
    === MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)