From more tan 23 years i think in convert my BBS from ELEBBS (before
RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
From more tan 23 years i think in convert my BBS from ELEBBS (before
RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
From: nospam.Manuel.Adorni@f27.n902.z4.binkp.net (Manuel Adorni)
Subject: ELEBBS to MYSTIC
!Hola Todos!
From more tan 23 years i think in convert my BBS from ELEBBS (before
RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
From more tan 23 years i think in convert my BBS from ELEBBS
(before RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
No.
If it's working, don't fix it. If you have put a lot of time into
your current setup and are pleased with it, then why change and start afresh again?
From more tan 23 years i think in convert my BBS from ELEBBS
(before RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
No.
Why? :-).
(before RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
No.
Why? :-).
Your the Z1C,
your system plays an important part as a mail hub. Mystic has known bugs...
So if you intend to use mystic's mail tosser you will cause problems
in the net.
21 Nov 16 10:51, you wrote to Manuel Adorni:
(before RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
No.
Why? :-).
Your the Z1C,
since when? i wasn't aware that Z4 had merged into Z1... i definitely wasn't aware that there was any sort of Z1C election that placed anyone other than janis in the Z1C seat...
Your the Z1C, your system plays an important part as a mail hub. Mystic has known bugs...
So if you intend to use mystic's mail tosser you will cause problems in the net.
i agree with this two statements... that's also why we are sticking with the last version available and not playing the alpha games with the current code... as much as we'd like to, we're not chasing the
maintainer across multiple FTNs just to stay abreast of developments and
From more tan 23 years i think in convert my BBS from ELEBBS (before
RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
Your the Z1C, your system plays an important part as a mail hub.
Mystic has known bugs...
No.
Why? :-).
Your the Z1C,
since when? i wasn't aware that Z4 had merged into Z1... i definitely wasn't aware that there was any sort of Z1C election that placed anyone other than janis in the Z1C seat...
your system plays an important part as a mail hub. Mystic has known
bugs...
So if you intend to use mystic's mail tosser you will cause problems
in the net.
i agree with this two statements... that's also why we are sticking with the last version available
and not playing the alpha games with the current code... as much as
we'd like to, we're not chasing the maintainer across multiple FTNs
just to stay abreast of developments and bugs...
Your the Z1C, your system plays an important part as a mail hub.
Mystic has known bugs...
So if you intend to use mystic's mail tosser you will cause problems
in the net.
This is not correct. If he is planning on using a Mystic BBS and it's tosser to receive packets in to his BBS then there are no known issues. If he is planning on using the same tosser to send content generated at his BBS then again there are no known issues that that will arise.
If he intends to toss incoming packets on to other configured echo nodes and these are nodes with no other connection to Fidonet (they are not meshed aka FidoWeb style) then there are no known issues.
The known issue arises only when he opts to toss incoming packets to other configured echonodes that are also in a meshed environment with other systems whereby dupe traffic is created. In this case packets being tossed by the tosser and sent to echo nodes are presently having the message creation time stamp seconds field being set to 00 and not left untouched.
This for some meshed systems causes problems for their dupe detection.
I post this reply to offer a more complete view of the situation rather than just simply stating 'no don't use it' etc. As in reality Mystic BBS 1.12 A31 can happily be used in many cases by sysops, and is. :)
... when he returns from his latest break :)
Your the Z1C, your system plays an important part as a mail hub.
Mystic has known bugs...
He said he'll switch the BBS to Mystic. He doesn't necessarily has to use Mystic's internal mailer. In my case, I use Mystic and Binkd/Husky as mail tools.
'when' or 'if' ?
'when' or 'if' ?
I remain optimistic that's a when... not an if :)
From more tan 23 years i think in convert my BBS from ELEBBS (before
RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
... when he returns from his latest break :)
'when' or 'if' ?
I post this reply to offer a more complete view of the situation
rather than just simply stating 'no don't use it' etc. As in reality Mystic BBS 1.12 A31 can happily be used in many cases by sysops, and
is. :)
i agree with this two statements... that's also why we are sticking
with the last version available and not playing the alpha games with
the current code... as much as we'd like to, we're not chasing the
maintainer across multiple FTNs just to stay abreast of developments
and
There is no need to chase James... he often posts here and has stated
the other NETs and echo areas he frequents for support requests on the mysticbbs.com site. If you're lurking here then I'm sure you will be
able to chat about these things with him when he returns from his
latest break :)
From more tan 23 years i think in convert my BBS from ELEBBS (before
RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
Yes it is. You'll never look back.
i agree with this two statements... that's also why we are sticking
with the last version available
"we" ?
mark lewis wrote to Paul Hayton <=-
one has to wonder if those making statements like was made have
considered or even gone ahead and actually installed, learned and
worked with the software being discussed... i find many times that they have not and have also fallen victim to the same... that's one reason
why i have my own mystic system as well as hosting another mystic
system along with a synchronet system... then there's a dbridge installation as well as a pure point with fmail and taurus...
this is akin to the political thing about if you don't vote, you don't have the right to whine and cry...
Hi Paul,
On 2016-11-22 23:13:08, you wrote to me:
'when' or 'if' ?
I remain optimistic that's a when... not an if :)
It remains to be seen... ;)
return.'when' or 'if' ?
I remain optimistic that's a when... not an if :)
It remains to be seen... ;)
I have more faith that James will return, than I do that Jesus will
I have more faith that James will return, than I do that Jesus willThat's easy the latter is dead, so zero chance of that... ;)
* An ongoing debate between Wilfred van Velzen and Gryphon rages on ...
I have more faith that James will return, than I do that Jesus willThat's easy the latter is dead, so zero chance of that... ;)
No, no, no ... Risen, not dead! He WILL come again, so mind your P's &
Q's ! {chuckle}
Keep the faith,
I have more faith that James will return, than I do that Jesus
will return.
That's easy the latter is dead, so zero chance of that... ;)
Faith can move mountains, Wilfred. ;)
I have more faith that James will return, than I do that Jesus will
return.
That's easy the latter is dead, so zero chance of that... ;)
Faith can move mountains, Wilfred. ;)
Manuel Adorni wrote to Todos <=-
!Hola Todos!
From more tan 23 years i think in convert my BBS from ELEBBS (before
RA) to MYSTIC. Is a good idea???
always run both systems in paralel while you make the changes... I like Mystic a lot, and nowadays with the embedded mailer/tosser it eases up
the maintenance workload a bit.
It takes a while because both systems are completely
different, but you can always run both systems in paralel while you
make the changes... I like Mystic a lot, and nowadays with the
embedded mailer/tosser it eases up the maintenance workload a bit.
It takes a while because both systems are completely
different, but you can always run both systems in paralel while
you make the changes... I like Mystic a lot, and nowadays with
the embedded mailer/tosser it eases up the maintenance workload a
bit.
Thanks Flavio for your words.
You are welcome! Happy to help, if you need assistance with this migration in Spanish we can discuss it in the spanish echoes.
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495937:53:12 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,958 |