Let us call that magic.
I went with 60 columns to make sure that it looks okay on displays
that don't count multibyte characters as one character. Let us call
that magic.
feel free to make msged unicode compatibel
does not help where unicode is not supported
does not help where unicode is not supported
I believe that squish and jam are the problem at the moment ...
probably always were as far as a purely text based messaging format is concerned, including (especially?) where utf-8 compatibilty is
concerned.
why would you think that?
they don't care one iota about the contents of the message body
they are just storage formats... nothing more...
And they should remain there. No proper text messaging editor should need to deal with any of that. Having said that, I have been using a modified MSG format to create and read fidonet messages. Without the binary crap that makes up the first 14 bytes of the MSG format it has worked well thus far and makes it very easy for tacking on the crap just prior to shipping off to the mothership.
Why do you think the message editors are doing something
different?
How about you? What would you recommend especially considering proper handling of utf-8?
For reading you need some routine that presents folders and files
For writing som filter to collate the header and kludges.
Filally there is the tricky part, that the message has to be
store in your message store.
smapi library of the husky project
I am still looking for the holy grail.
feel free to make msged unicode compatibel
That will take a bit of doing. Offhand I think a modified MSG format would be the place to start so that there is a text message structure that could be encorporated into msged and the ilk.
I've played with a
purely text based MSG format for ages now and it is the basis for what
I am doing in vim as we speak.
does not help where unicode is not supported
I believe that squish and jam are the problem at the moment ...
probably always were as far as a purely text based messaging format is concerned, including (especially?) where utf-8 compatibilty is
concerned.
For now I am most concerned about bringing the coreutils' i18n compatibility up to date.
Hopefully that won't take too long and in
the meantime I am playing around with a FTN-ish wireless mesh idea
using the node and a point system (Guy Robot) that deploys binkd for transfers.
I was going to look at hpt later on and I suspect that
would be the start of a utf-8 compatible Fidonet messaging system.
What do you think?
change to html, with all readers support
if we change lets change in a good way, not make we need another
encoding format
you dont need that, tidy is you friend
are you sure latin1 is more correct then latin-1
amiga have always being latin-1
maybe i just need to start amiga up again
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495947:04:58 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 287,048 |