do you see a question mark? ;)
i don't konw but the original comment was about steam requiring 32bit libs for something ;)
i don't konw but the original comment was about steam requiring
32bit libs for something ;)
I can confirm that was what was stated.
However looking at what
little real information is provided by the steam people that comment seems somewhat questionable given that a 64 bit cpu is considered a
must by those claiming to be in the know of all things steam.
I think
some of the games require 32-bit libs to satisfy their limitations and not steam itself.
Anyhow that is my take on the flimsy amount of meaningful information
I could gather in my searches about it.
why is the possible source precompiled problem using both 32bit
and 64bit
soon have kernel 4.12.10 here :=)
multilib ARM based systems/distributions. I have noticed a number of aarch64 patches for glibc lately.
Linux mikey 4.12.10 #1 SMP Wed Aug 30 21:35:55 UTC 2017 x86_64
Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU C2758 @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
It still has that new kernel smell.
drop multilib, it saves ram, and raise speeds
this is still not gentoo :=)
but atom is atleast not supporting intel ME (nsa / fbi / silly
govments interfaces>
if i know right systemd parts on linux help it
i don't konw but the original comment was about steam requiring 32bit
libs for something ;)
and you telling something about opensuse problem in the middle of it all
Hey Benny!
drop multilib, it saves ram, and raise speeds
I haven't used multilib since the first custom build I did way back
when, around 15 years ago. See below for the latest glibc deployed
here;
----- '<Esc>:read !/lib/libc.so.6' starts
GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.26, by Roland
McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 7.2.0.
Available extensions:
crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
GNU Libidn by Simon Josefsson
Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich Drepper et al
BIND-8.2.3-T5B
libc ABIs: UNIQUE IFUNC
For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html>.
----- '<Esc>:read !/lib/libc.so.6' ends
Furthermore there is no lib64 even as symlinks anywhere on the latest x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu, or my other box which is a comparable x86_64-bonnell-linux-gnu.
The only reason I mentioned multilib was because someone here stated
that he required 32 bit libs to run some games on what looks to me to
be a 64 bit system. Also it was a reply to one of my aarch64 running
on a raspberry pi 3 so I suspect he thought that the aarch64 ought to
be multilib which it isn't, or at least the one I first built wasn't.
this is still not gentoo :=)
Correct. I don't have any of their tools and instead built my own and
so far continue to use those. Simple, lean and mean for whatever task they are allocated to take care of.
but atom is atleast not supporting intel ME (nsa / fbi / silly
govments interfaces>
I honestly don't care. None of them are paying the bills here so
their input ... or lack of it ... is of no importance, especially considering that they are US government and not Canadian.
if i know right systemd parts on linux help it
Not that I ever noticed. I am still using sysvinit. Also still using lilo instead of (U)EFI boots ... just like Mom used to do. :-)
I see no reason to change ... yet. Do you?
Life is good,
Maurice
... Don't cry for me I have vi.
-+- GNU bash, version 4.4.12(1)-release (x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu)
+ Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
i got more memory to do other more usefull things with it
how do you make that output ?, imho its not ldd :=)
systemresquecd would just be better choice and chroot it there
i like to get lowpowered atom cpu bassed servers in comming years
still using gentoo here with systemd disabled
i got more memory to do other more usefull things with it
How much do you have on the p4?
On the silvermont I have 32G of ECC
which is overkill for what I have been doing with it especially considering ECC is more expensive.
The system can handle up to 64G
which would have cost as much an entire PC memory included.
ECC is
worth more but I think 16G (2 8G sticks) would have been more than
enough for what I do with it.
how do you make that output ?, imho its not ldd :=)
On the commandline just do '/lib/libc.so.6' to replicate the output.
It should give you all the gory details as shown in the vim file
capture except with whatever version of your glibc including the
version of the compiler it was built with.
systemresquecd would just be better choice and chroot it there
I just use chroot on the last one I built to build a new one when
there is a major release such as the latest glibc-2.26.
i like to get lowpowered atom cpu bassed servers in comming years
I can recommend the 8 core C2758 based boards. The one I have is a
uATX which uses standard DIMM slots instead of SODIMM found on the miniITX boards which I believe is more expensive and harder to come
by, or at least the ECC variety is. The 8 penguins on boot is nice to see. ;-)
still using gentoo here with systemd disabled
Amen. Isn't eudev origianlly a gentoo based product? That is what I
am currently using here.
Life is good,
Maurice
... Don't cry for me I have vi.
-+- GNU bash, version 4.4.12(1)-release (x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu)
i am still impressed i did not get out of mem
will google more on them, to make a choice later with it
now have kernel 4.13
i am still impressed i did not get out of mem
You didn't say whether that is a 64 bit system and if 32 bit it
doesn't surprise me that ~1G is more than enough. I used to get away with 512M of memory and still being able to build an entire root/boot system on it. Mind you that was over 15 years ago.
but after playing with it I might actually make it my default boot. Offhand the 2.13 kernel seems better than the 2.12's. We'll soon find out.
----- '<Esc>:read !uname -a' starts
Linux armando 4.12.5-v8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Aug 9 07:00:58 UTC 2017
aarch64 GNU/Linux
----- '<Esc>:read !uname -a' ends
Sweet. Custom built on an actual raspberry pi 3. It took 3 hours and
20 minutes with 'make -j4'. Also of interest;
----- '<Esc>:read !/lib/libc.so.6' starts
GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.26, by Roland
McGrath et al. Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This
is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Compiled by GNU CC version 7.1.1 20170802. Available
extensions: crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others GNU
Libidn by Simon Josefsson Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich
Drepper et al BIND-8.2.3-T5B libc ABIs: UNIQUE For bug reporting instructions, please
see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html>.
----- '<Esc>:read !uname -a' ends
The above was also built on an actual raspberry pi 3 using a custom
built gcc-7.2-RC-20170802 compiler which shows as 'GNU CC version
7.1.1 20170802' above. Note that all three are arm64 (aka aarch64)
and that the 4.12.5-v8 kernel is hot out of the oven and just booted
and mounted the new arm64 rootfs that I am typing this message on.
I do good work. :-)
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.12(1)-release (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
I may have to go this route at some point in the future.
That Archlinux aarch64 install got testy with me so I wiped it.
Certain things wouldn't work as expected, or at all even.
I suppose that's why they don't care to support it though. :|
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.12(1)-release (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Proof is in the pudding.
Personally I am blaming systemd. It appeared to me that it was 99.99%
of the console grief I was seeing.
I build PiLFS on my 2nd Pi.. took 2 days to build the entire base
system with full development tools with MAKEOPTS="-j 1" lol
All distro's should give the option of fallback to OpenRC init for
those that don't want to run Gnome3
systemd is nothing but a pain in the ass
That is more or less what I just did except with -j4 and generic enough that it could run on other arm64 systems such as pine64 and/or odroids with 64 bit cpus. Also it is a tad shy of what I was targetting since gcc-7.2 has yet to be released. I remain confident it will work when
the time comes which should be any day now.
If you want to be really adventurous try using the PiLFS
instructions to build LFS 5.0 ..
I wonder if a 2.4 kernel would run on a Pi3 ..
Hey Strawberry!
----- '<Esc>:read !uname -a' starts
Linux armando 4.12.5-v8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Aug 9 07:00:58 UTC 2017 aarch64 GNU/Linux
----- '<Esc>:read !uname -a' ends
Sweet. Custom built on an actual raspberry pi 3. It took 3 hours and
20 minutes with 'make -j4'. Also of interest;
----- '<Esc>:read !/lib/libc.so.6' starts
GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.26, by Roland
McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 7.1.1 20170802.
Available extensions:
crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
GNU Libidn by Simon Josefsson
Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich Drepper et al
BIND-8.2.3-T5B
libc ABIs: UNIQUE
For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html>.
----- '<Esc>:read !uname -a' ends
The above was also built on an actual raspberry pi 3 using a custom
built gcc-7.2-RC-20170802 compiler which shows as 'GNU CC version
7.1.1 20170802' above. Note that all three are arm64 (aka aarch64)
and that the 4.12.5-v8 kernel is hot out of the oven and just booted
and mounted the new arm64 rootfs that I am typing this message on.
I do good work. :-)
you should really try gentoo ;)
nice, wish it was my pi3
(7.1.0) **7.1.0-r1^s
yes, and eath french fries all day :=)
you should really try gentoo ;)
wish i could make custom microsd for pi3
most of the work was already done cuz I followed the PiLFS book
to do it
On 08/15/17, Benny Pedersen said the following...
you should really try gentoo ;)
Gentoo is awesome.. I run it on one of my laptops only because my main machine is a pure 64 bit nomultilib linux
and I need some 32 bit libraries
for some stuff (like Steam) so I use the gentoo box for my steam box
no ebuild for this kind of software ?
On 08/18/17, Benny Pedersen said the following...
no ebuild for this kind of software ?
Not for Steam.. it requires 32bit libraries to run.. and I have no
desire to incorporate anything that will not run in 64bit mode :)
[...]no ebuild for this kind of software ?
Not for Steam.. it requires 32bit libraries to run.. and I have no
desire to incorporate anything that will not run in 64bit mode :)
eix --nocolor -Rc steam
----- steam.ebuilds begins -----
Found 15 matches
----- steam.ebuilds ends -----
why wait ? :=)
Not for Steam.. it requires 32bit libraries to run.. and I have no desire to incorporate anything that will not run in 64bit mode :)eix --nocolor -Rc steam
On 2017 Aug 20 17:36:44, you wrote to Dave Vandermeer:
no ebuild for this kind of software ?
Not for Steam.. it requires 32bit libraries to run.. and I have no
desire to incorporate anything that will not run in 64bit mode :)
eix --nocolor -Rc steam
why wait ? :=)
those are all 64bit??
On 08/20/17, Benny Pedersen said the following...
Not for Steam.. it requires 32bit libraries to run.. and I haveeix --nocolor -Rc steam
no desire to incorporate anything that will not run in 64bit mode
:)
You are misunderstanding me lol..
I build the gentoo box to RUN steam because
my main machine is pure 64 bit nomultilib Suse
and steam REQUIRES 32bit versions of a few libraries hence the multilibgentoo box :D
no ebuild for this kind of software ?
Not for Steam.. it requires 32bit libraries to run.. and I have no
desire to incorporate anything that will not run in 64bit mode :)
eix --nocolor -Rc steam
why wait ? :=)
those are all 64bit??
is this a question ?
how can i help more ?
i don't konw but the original comment was about steam requiring
32bit libs for something ;)
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495942:21:00 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 287,020 |