So, I see in the configuration file that echomail.jam is indeed
supported. But, how and were the hell does netmail come into play? Apparantly there is no netmail.jam support? Or does netmail get place
into the echomail.jam file? I didn't scour the docs about it, but.. it seemed pretty obvious as other softwares seem to support both formats.
So, I see in the configuration file that echomail.jam is indeed supported. But, how and were the hell does netmail come into play? Apparantly thereis
no netmail.jam support? Or does netmail get place into the echomail.jam file?
So, I see in the configuration file that echomail.jam is indeed
supported. But, how and were the hell does netmail come into play? Apparantly there is no netmail.jam support? Or does netmail get place
into the echomail.jam file? I didn't scour the docs about it, but.. it seemed pretty obvious as other softwares seem to support both formats.
I must admit that I don't understand shit of what you are talking
about above. echomail.jam? netmail.jam?
I have some 100 or so different *.JAM here, one for every echo.
There does appear to be netmail.jam support. I use it here and on my
main system, with scripts & BATches.
OTOH, my Linux script uses a fall-through approach when looking for
those semaphores/data files; that is to say that it attempts using named *.jam files as arguments, and if none are found it does a mass scan out
in any case.
So, I see in the configuration file that echomail.jam is indeed supported.
But, how and were the hell does netmail come into play? Apparantly
no netmail.jam support? Or does netmail get place into the echomail.jam
file?
IIRC, new netmail goes to echomail.jam as well.
So, I see in the configuration file that echomail.jam is indeed
supported. But, how and were the hell does netmail come into play?
Apparantly there is no netmail.jam support? Or does netmail get place
into the echomail.jam file? I didn't scour the docs about it, but.. it
seemed pretty obvious as other softwares seem to support both formats.
I must admit that I don't understand shit of what you are talking about above. echomail.jam? netmail.jam?
I have some 100 or so different *.JAM here, one for every echo. Plus of course one for netmail:
!NETMAIL A 2:203/2 s:\fido\areas\NETMAIL
Thanks for the info, Paul!
Thanks for the info, Paul!
Nup. My bad. I'd forgotten what I had done, and I got it mixed up with Golded's config. I configured JamNNTPd to use the -echomailjam option
to set a generic semaphore which is the target of a cron job.
I beg a thousand pardons.
FWIW, the data in the semaphore is as documented for JamNNTPd. It would/could serve for both netmail & echomail... like Tommi said.
Yep, I've noticed this now. Although I'm not actually making any use
of the contents of echomail.jam currently, since I'm basically only searching for it, and if it exists, running the tosser and scanning through every area rather than only the specific ones contained in
the file. :(
Nicholas Boel : Paul Quinn
Yep, I've noticed this now. Although I'm not actually making any use
of the contents of echomail.jam currently, since I'm basically only
searching for it, and if it exists, running the tosser and scanning
through every area rather than only the specific ones contained in
the file. :(
Yep. Running "hpt scan -w pack -w" is pretty fast operation to run when echomail.jam appears. No need for anything fancier. ;)
Why do you run it with the -w option (without highwaters)? Curious
minds would like to know. :)
I must admit that I don't understand shit of what you are talking
about above. echomail.jam? netmail.jam?
Really?!
Why do you run it with the -w option (without highwaters)? Curious
minds would like to know. :)
Just to make sure all unsent messages will be sent.
My bad -- now back to my usual hibernate mode. 8-)
Why do you run it with the -w option (without highwaters)? Curious
minds would like to know. :)
Just to make sure all unsent messages will be sent.
I guess I'm still unsure as to why the "-w" option is necessary.
Doesn't it send out all unsent messages without that option as well?
Before you go back to hibernating, I believe I have all the kinks worked out if you care to add my JamNNTPd server to the list in the snooze.
Just to make sure all unsent messages will be sent.
I guess I'm still unsure as to why the "-w" option is necessary.
Doesn't it send out all unsent messages without that option as well?
if there are unsent ones behind the watermark, they won't be seen
because the scan starts at the watermark... ignoring the watermark makes the scan start at the very beginning...
Before you go back to hibernating, I believe I have all the kinks worked
out if you care to add my JamNNTPd server to the list in the snooze.
Excellent!
Excellent!
Thanks, Bjorn!
I must admit that I don't understand shit of what you are
talking about above. echomail.jam? netmail.jam?
Really?!
I'm terribly sorry, I didn't realize that you were talking about
semaphore files -- I thought that you somehow managed to get all
echoes into one single jam file quad.
Just to make sure all unsent messages will be sent.
I guess I'm still unsure as to why the "-w" option is necessary.
Doesn't it send out all unsent messages without that option as well?
Just to make sure all unsent messages will be sent.
I guess I'm still unsure as to why the "-w" option is necessary.
Doesn't it send out all unsent messages without that option as
well?
if there are unsent ones behind the watermark, they won't be seen
because the scan starts at the watermark... ignoring the
watermark makes the scan start at the very beginning...
So with that said, if I read further than the message I reply to, the message wouldn't be scanned?
"I must admit that I don't understand shit of what you are talking"
You were absolutely right about that. :D
Just to make sure all unsent messages will be sent.
I guess I'm still unsure as to why the "-w" option is necessary.
Doesn't it send out all unsent messages without that option as well?
if there are unsent ones behind the watermark, they won't be seen
because the scan starts at the watermark... ignoring the watermark
makes the scan start at the very beginning...
So with that said, if I read further than the message I reply to, the message wouldn't be scanned?
(eg: another message base maint tool purging and packing and not
updating the watermark due to format differences)
"I must admit that I don't understand shit of what you are
talking"
You were absolutely right about that. :D
Never admit to a mistake to a Finn... 8-)
(eg: another message base maint tool purging and packing and not
updating the watermark due to format differences)
Ah yes. How can we prevent something like that happening? It's
truly a PITA whenever it happens.
So with that said, if I read further than the message I reply to, the
message wouldn't be scanned?
The lastread pointers are not the watermark. Tosser remembers the last message it has scanned. If for some reason the messages are renumbered
or something else illegal happens, the tosser may not start scanning at the right place.
In theory it is possible, but not very likely.
(eg: another message base maint tool purging and packing and not
updating the watermark due to format differences)
Ah yes. How can we prevent something like that happening? It's truly a PITA whenever it happens.
For starters, do not purge and/or pack your message bases? I haven't
done this since I started using Golded, as those type of functions
would mess that program up as well.
For starters, do not purge and/or pack your message bases? I haven't
done this since I started using Golded, as those type of functions
would mess that program up as well.
For starters, do not purge and/or pack your message bases? I haven't
done this since I started using Golded, as those type of functions
would mess that program up as well.
I pack/purge and renumber my jam message bases daily. GoldEd+ has no problem with that!?
For starters, do not purge and/or pack your message bases? I haven't
done this since I started using Golded, as those type of functions
would mess that program up as well.
How does it mess up Golded?
Never seen that. (for JamNNTPd it is clear, as the clients store the msg numbers)
I pack/purge and renumber my jam message bases daily. GoldEd+ has no problem with that!?
(eg: another message base maint tool purging and packing and not
updating the watermark due to format differences)
Ah yes. How can we prevent something like that happening? It's truly a PITA whenever it happens.
(eg: another message base maint tool purging and packing and not
updating the watermark due to format differences)
Ah yes. How can we prevent something like that happening? It's truly
a PITA whenever it happens.
For starters, do not purge and/or pack your message bases? I haven't
done this since I started using Golded, as those type of functions
would mess that program up as well.
For starters, do not purge and/or pack your message bases? I haven't
done this since I started using Golded, as those type of functions
would mess that program up as well.
I pack/purge and renumber my jam message bases daily. GoldEd+ has no problem with that!?
For starters, do not purge and/or pack your message bases? I haven't
done this since I started using Golded, as those type of functions
would mess that program up as well.
How does it mess up Golded? Never seen that. (for JamNNTPd it is
clear, as the clients store the msg numbers)
you don't run JAMNNTPd on those message bases, do you? ;)
you can purge and pack to maintain the counts you have set... just don't renumber... that's the worst nasty... trying to convince certain maintainers of that is another task altogether... *cough* mystic *cough*
For starters, do not purge and/or pack your message bases? I
haven't done this since I started using Golded, as those type of
functions would mess that program up as well.
I pack/purge and renumber my jam message bases daily. GoldEd+ has no problem with that!?
you can purge and pack to maintain the counts you have set... just
don't renumber... that's the worst nasty... trying to convince
certain maintainers of that is another task altogether... *cough*
mystic *cough*
Have you asked Rob about Synchronet doing the same?
You test both softwares there, so you should be well aware.
Have you asked Rob about Synchronet doing the same?
i have not... mainly because, unless i'm seriously missing something,
SBBS doesn't have a news server and there's no 3rd party news server
that i know of that provides access to the SBBS proprietary message base format...
I was wondering what might be the maximum of message numbers im JAM? I have for example 69752 messages at COOKING. Messages are numbered 69710-139462. ;)
20 Dec 16 17:12, you wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
I was wondering what might be the maximum of message numbers im
JAM? I have for example 69752 messages at COOKING. Messages are
numbered 69710-139462. ;)
longint...
max message size : 2147483647
max message base size : 2147483647
max messages in one base : 2147483647
if an unsigned longint is used, then double those to 4294967295 but
then there may be problems when used with software using a signed longint...
Have you asked Rob about Synchronet doing the same?
i have not... mainly because, unless i'm seriously missing something,
SBBS doesn't have a news server and there's no 3rd party news server
that i know of that provides access to the SBBS proprietary message
base format...
Synchronet does indeed have it's own NNTP server.
I was wondering what might be the maximum of message numbers im JAM?
I have for example 69752 messages at COOKING. Messages are numbered
69710-139462. ;)
longint...
max message size : 2147483647
max message base size : 2147483647
max messages in one base : 2147483647
if an unsigned longint is used, then double those to 4294967295 but
then there may be problems when used with software using a signed
longint...
Right. So no need for renumbering in near future. ;)
Synchronet does indeed have it's own NNTP server.
in any case, if SBBS has its own news server and it automatically renumbers, then it has some method to keep the numbers straight... you can't easily do that with a 3rd party server that doesn't keep up with them... JAMNNTPd is such a 3rd party news server and i'm not aware of
any other being available to serve FTN messages...
[time passes]
aww, crap... i found the settings for the SBBS news server in the services.ini :rolleyes:
it just seems like it would be in sbbs.ini along with [BBS], [Mail],
[FTP] and [Web] :?
that's why i can't fathom being forced to renumber JAM bases...
Synchronet does indeed have it's own NNTP server.
in any case, if SBBS has its own news server and it automatically
renumbers, then it has some method to keep the numbers straight...
you can't easily do that with a 3rd party server that doesn't keep up
with them... JAMNNTPd is such a 3rd party news server and i'm not
aware of any other being available to serve FTN messages...
Even if your message bases were set to renumber, I doubt any client
would ever know that.
Even if your message bases were set to renumber, I doubt any client
would ever know that.
they don't but the problem is that when you go to pull new posts and
miss the ones between your last pull and the renumber... let me try to explain that batter...
now consider if the BBS hasn't pulled 25 since it purged and
renumbered... when your client requests #50, there is no #50 on the
BBS... now what?
that's why i can't fathom being forced to renumber JAM bases...
I can, and I think you know it. It's about the Frontdoor Editor for
DOS that has this extraordinary, remarkable 16k limit.
Nowadays I rarely use FE and when I do it's always on smaller JAM
bases than 16k messages in it, so no big deal.
*Then again, I also do not want my message base starting at any number besides 1. So that usually leads to me just backing up and wiping the message bases completely, starting fresh again until they reach an annoying amount.
Either way, my last message to Wilfred explained the issue I had.
But if that doesn't happen with JAM bases, that's great!
Nowadays I rarely use FE and when I do it's always on smaller JAM
bases than 16k messages in it, so no big deal.
my FE (fastecho) doesn't have problems on my bases... at least not
yet... maybe one day but at that time, sure, i'll renumber but on my terms... not an autorenumber all the time... oh well...
Nowadays I rarely use FE and when I do it's always on smaller JAM
bases than 16k messages in it, so no big deal.
my FE (fastecho) doesn't have problems on my bases... at least not
yet... maybe one day but at that time, sure, i'll renumber but on my
terms... not an autorenumber all the time... oh well...
Sorry, I meant of course FM. The name -- Frontdoor Editor -- had me confused.
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495942:08:39 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,996 |