OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system, Cthulhu accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D
OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system,You *do* know that when sacrificing a virgin, virgin olive oil
Cthulhu accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D
will *not* be accepted as a substitute? 8-)
Il Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:59:30 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Paul Quinn ha scritto:
I have three JamNNTPd's running in 32bit systems. They all work fine.
OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system, Cthulhu accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D
OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system, Cthulhu
accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D
You *do* know that when sacrificing a virgin, virgin olive oil will *not* be accepted as a substitute? 8-)
They have virgins in Italy???
@MSGID: 2:335/364 5d54387a
@PID: JamNNTPd/Linux 1
@CHRS: UTF-8 2
@TZUTC: 0200
@TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08
Il Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:59:30 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Paul Quinn ha scritto:
I have three JamNNTPd's running in 32bit systems. They all work fine.
OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system, Cthulhu accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D
OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system,
Cthulhu accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D
Crikey-Moses! You're not having any good luck. If it's your own
compile, and you're actually replying to Tommi's message, then your
JamNNTPd is not honouring the Fidonet bits. That's something I noticed
in a previous message too.
When I looked around for a binary back in 2011 to run in Xubuntu/32
10.04 LTS, I put aside the newly-compiled binary and went back to using
an older project I did in Puppy Liunx 4.12 (Linux 2.6.xx). It worked... properly.
It worked... properly.
Can you tell me how to compile 32bit executable in 64bit Linux ?
(Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS (GNU/Linux 4.4.0-159-generic x86_64))
Or if I compile jamnntpd in 32bit i386 system, will it run in 64bit
x86_64 linux?
I was also using Puppy-compiled binaries for CrashMail (before FMail32/lnx), rather than new compiles. They work especially well in 32bit VMs too.
Can I interest you in some old favourites?
They have virgins in Italy???
WTF! Still an empty to line with JamNNTPd!
What version of JamNNTPD executable is this?
I just noticed that there is no ^AREPLY kludge in his message.
Can you tell me how to compile 32bit executable in 64bit Linux ?
(Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS (GNU/Linux 4.4.0-159-generic x86_64))
Or if I compile jamnntpd in 32bit i386 system, will it run in 64bit
x86_64 linux?
Can I interest you in some old favourites?
Naaa, thank you but I have to do it in the new architecture, I have to win. :)
What version of JamNNTPD executable is this?
I built it from 1.3 sources.
This is another option:install the
It' simple, you have to add the i386 architecture to the system and
i386 libraries needed by the binary you want to run, for debian based distributons you have to do this:
dpkg --add-architecture i386
apt update
apt install libc6-i386
now you can run ia32 binaries on a amd64 system. :)
@MSGID: 2:221/6.0 5d552294
@REPLY: 2:335/364.1 5d5504b2
@PID: JamNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20190815
@REPLYADDR tommi@rbb.homeip.net
@CHRS: UTF-8 2
@TZUTC: 0300
@TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-08-15
This is another option:
It' simple, you have to add the i386 architecture to the system
and install the i386 libraries needed by the binary you want to
run, for debian based distributons you have to do this:
dpkg --add-architecture i386
apt update
apt install libc6-i386
now you can run ia32 binaries on a amd64 system. :)
So here it goes.. :)
15-Aug-19 12:10:20 JamNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20190815 is running on port 1119 15-Aug-19 12:11:13 (2001:470:1f15:cb0:2:221:1:1:52069) Connection established to wat.ad.rbb.homeip.net 15-Aug-19 12:11:17 (2001:470:1f15:cb0:2:221:1:1:52069) Logged in as tommi 15-Aug-19
12:11:39 (2001:470:1f15:cb0:2:221:1:1:52069) Posted message to
rbb.test.1 (#7)
So far so good...
'Tommi
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbir
* Origin: ===========-----------------............... (2:221/6.0) SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/0 1 6 242 360 240/1120 280/464 5003 5555 320/219 335/364
SEEN-BY: 640/305 1321 1384 3634/12
@PATH: 221/6 1 640/1384
Or if I compile jamnntpd in 32bit i386 system, will it run in 64bit
x86_64 linux?
TK> @PID: JamNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20190815
TK> So far so good...
TK> 'Tommi
Not bad for a barbarian (talking to a Roman). ;)
Naaa, thank you but I have to do it in the new architecture, I
have to win. :)
Yes! That is my mantra also. 'I will always win.' Good man!
I built it from 1.3 sources.
From the SourceForge repository? I think they made some pretty style fixes but introduced new instability issues. I suggest you return to
the v1.0/1.1 sources from Johan.
So here it goes.. :)
15-Aug-19 12:10:20 JamNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20190815 is running on port 1119 15-Aug-19 12:11:13 (2001:470:1f15:cb0:2:221:1:1:52069) Connection established to wat.ad.rbb.homeip.net 15-Aug-19 12:11:17 (2001:470:1f15:cb0:2:221:1:1:52069) Logged in as tommi 15-Aug-19
12:11:39 (2001:470:1f15:cb0:2:221:1:1:52069) Posted message to
rbb.test.1 (#7)
So far so good...
So far so good...
Not bad for a barbarian (talking to a Roman). ;)
Not bad for a barbarian (talking to a Roman). ;)He isn't a barbarian, Ward and Bjorn are! They like tu put Pineapple
on pizza!
They deserve to be crucifixes along the Appia like Spartacus and his fellows. :P
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495937:50:08 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,957 |