,361,RBB,Ylojarvi,Tommi_Koivula,-Unpublished-,9600,CM,XA,IBN,INA:[2001:41d0:401
:3100::1030],INA:rbb.bbs.fi,U,ENC
Any particular reason why you have choosen this way instead of just
adding an AAAA record to rbb.bbs.fi?
,361,RBB,Ylojarvi,Tommi_Koivula,-Unpublished-,9600,CM,XA,IBN,
INA:[2001:41d0:401:3100::1030],INA:rbb.bbs.fi,U,ENC
Any particular reason why you have choosen this way instead of just
adding an AAAA record to rbb.bbs.fi?
No.
Hello Tommi, On Saturday April 15 2017 08:49, you wrote to me:
,361,RBB,Ylojarvi,Tommi_Koivula,-Unpublished-,9600,CM,XA,IBN,
INA:[2001:41d0:401:3100::1030],INA:rbb.bbs.fi,U,ENC Any
particular reason why you have choosen this way instead of just
adding an AAAA record to rbb.bbs.fi?
No.Any non-particular reason maybe?
Any non-particular reason maybe?
Stay tuned for the next nodelist update. :)
Hello Tommi, On Saturday April 15 2017 18:58, you wrote to me:
It so happens that the FTSC is in the process of reviewingAny non-particular reason maybe?
FTS-5001 and the part about using multiple INA flags. That is why
I asked about your reasons for this particular way of advertising
IPv6 and IPv4 capability.
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495931:54:16 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,898 |