1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. FIDOTEST

  • test using sem + bw @rampton box

    From August Abolins@2:221/360 to All on Mon May 6 14:13:00 2019
    Hi All,

    I simple test with SemPoint (editor) + BW (transfer) @rbb.bbs

    [1] This should be on a line/paragrph by itself.

    [2] This line should *also* be on a line by itself.


    ../|ug

    * SeM. 2.26 * Cleanliness is next to impossible.

    --- Concord/2/BW 001B30d (Reg.)
    * Origin: - rbb - telnet://rbb.homeip.net - (2:221/360)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Mon May 6 16:15:37 2019
    Hi August,

    On 2019-05-06 14:13:00, you wrote to All:

    @MSGID: 2:221/360 571827a5
    @PID: Concord 0.01 Beta-30d OS/2 ser#cc38c58d
    @TID: GE/2 1.2
    @CHARSET: LATIN-1
    Hi All,

    I simple test with SemPoint (editor) + BW (transfer) @rbb.bbs

    [1] This should be on a line/paragrph by itself.

    [2] This line should *also* be on a line by itself.


    ../|ug

    * SeM. 2.26 * Cleanliness is next to impossible.

    --- Concord/2/BW 001B30d (Reg.)
    * Origin: - rbb - telnet://rbb.homeip.net - (2:221/360)
    SEEN-BY: 19/10 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 229/426 240/1120 5832 SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5555 310/31 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250 @PATH: 221/360 6 1 280/464

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Wilfred Van Velzen on Mon May 6 14:58:00 2019
    Hi Wilfred,

    THANK YOU. The following looks good,

    .: Test from rbb.bbs w/SemPoint via BW packet method = OK


    On <Mon, 06 May 19>, you wrote me:

    ===============================================================================
    @BBS: Rampton Birds' Box

    @TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    @PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
    @REPLY: 2:221/360 B3E25945
    @MSGID: 2:280/464 47AFA243

    On 2019-05-06 14:13:00, you wrote to All:

    @MSGID: 2:221/360 571827a5
    @PID: Concord 0.01 Beta-30d OS/2 ser#cc38c58d
    @TID: GE/2 1.2
    @CHARSET: LATIN-1
    Hi All,

    I simple test with SemPoint (editor) + BW (transfer) @rbb.bbs

    [1] This should be on a line/paragrph by itself.

    [2] This line should *also* be on a line by itself.


    ../|ug

    * SeM. 2.26 * Cleanliness is next to impossible.

    --- Concord/2/BW 001B30d (Reg.)
    * Origin: - rbb - telnet://rbb.homeip.net - (2:221/360)
    @PATH: 221/360 6 1 280/464



    * SeM. 2.26 * No error . . . yet.

    --- Concord/2/BW 001B30d (Reg.)
    * Origin: - rbb - telnet://rbb.homeip.net - (2:221/360)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/1 to August Abolins on Mon May 6 18:31:04 2019
    Hi August.

    06 May 19 14:13, you wrote to All:

    @MSGID: 2:221/360 571827a5
    @PID: Concord 0.01 Beta-30d OS/2 ser#cc38c58d
    @TID: GE/2 1.2
    @CHARSET: LATIN-1
    Hi All,

    No TZUTC kludge. ;-)

    I simple test with SemPoint (editor) + BW (transfer) @rbb.bbs

    [1] This should be on a line/paragrph by itself.

    [2] This line should *also* be on a line by itself.


    ../|ug

    * SeM. 2.26 * Cleanliness is next to impossible.

    --- Concord/2/BW 001B30d (Reg.)
    * Origin: - rbb - telnet://rbb.homeip.net - (2:221/360)
    SEEN-BY: 19/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 240/1120 280/464 5003 5555
    @PATH: 221/360 6 1

    'Tommi

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
    * Origin: nntps://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/1)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Tommi Koivula on Mon May 6 20:02:17 2019
    On 06/05/2019 11:31 a.m., Tommi Koivula : August Abolins wrote:

    @MSGID: 2:221/360 571827a5
    @PID: Concord 0.01 Beta-30d OS/2 ser#cc38c58d
    @TID: GE/2 1.2
    @CHARSET: LATIN-1
    Hi All,

    No TZUTC kludge. ;-)

    Noted! Sadly, last SemPoint v2.26 = 12-04-1999, which seems to predate the suggestion in ftsc 4008.002 in year 2003/2005 :(

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.
    * Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)
  • From Alan Ianson@1:153/757 to August Abolins on Mon May 6 10:50:24 2019
    Hello August,

    I simple test with SemPoint (editor) + BW (transfer) @rbb.bbs

    [1] This should be on a line/paragrph by itself.

    [2] This line should *also* be on a line by itself.

    Very curious, this message processed by Concord looks OK to me.

    Is it possible to use a different editor with SemPoint? I wonder if that would work better or not?

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-4
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
  • From Alan Ianson@1:153/757 to August Abolins on Mon May 6 10:58:22 2019
    No TZUTC kludge. ;-)

    Noted! Sadly, last SemPoint v2.26 = 12-04-1999, which seems to predate the suggestion in ftsc 4008.002 in year 2003/2005 :(

    That isn't a SemPoint issue. It's the BBS (tosser) that adds the kludges when messages are tossed out into the net.

    A TZUTC kludge would be good, but it's not fatal. There are several tossers in use that predate the TZUTC kludge that are abonadoned and will never support it, sadly.

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-4
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/360 to August Abolins on Mon May 6 21:07:42 2019
    Hi August.

    06 May 19 20:02:16, you wrote to me:

    On 06/05/2019 11:31 a.m., Tommi Koivula : August Abolins wrote:

    @MSGID: 2:221/360 571827a5
    @PID: Concord 0.01 Beta-30d OS/2a ser#cc38c58d
    @TID: GE/2 1.2
    @CHARSET: LATIN-1
    Hi All,

    No TZUTC kludge. ;-)

    Noted! Sadly, last SemPoint v2.26 = 12-04-1999, which seems to predate
    the
    suggestion in ftsc 4008.002 in year 2003/2005 :(

    Well, Concord is also almost 20 years old.

    But there is nothing you can do to add TZUTC kludge to messages posted by BW to
    Concord; there simply is no support for it.

    'Tommi

    ---
    * Origin: rbb.fidonet.fi (2:221/360)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Alan Ianson on Mon May 6 21:32:07 2019
    Hi Alan!

    On 06/05/2019 2:50 p.m., Alan Ianson : August Abolins wrote:

    I simple test with SemPoint (editor) + BW (transfer) @rbb.bbs

    [1] This should be on a line/paragrph by itself.

    [2] This line should *also* be on a line by itself.

    Very curious, this message processed by Concord looks OK to me.

    YES.. it does! :) This means that something is different is happening on your system.


    Is it possible to use a different editor with SemPoint? I wonder if that would work better or not?

    I can trigger an external editor, but I really doubt that's the source of the problem. rbb.bbs handles the BW packet fine.

    I can crashmail a reply BW packet for your system to you a little later.

    ...A

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.
    * Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)
  • From Alan Ianson@1:153/757 to August Abolins on Mon May 6 11:46:48 2019
    Hello August,

    Very curious, this message processed by Concord looks OK to me.

    YES.. it does! :) This means that something is different is happening on your system.

    There certainly is a problem but I'm still unsure of just what it is.

    Is it possible to use a different editor with SemPoint? I wonder if that
    would work better or not?

    I can trigger an external editor, but I really doubt that's the source of the problem. rbb.bbs handles the BW packet fine.

    If you don't mind please try that, either in here or a local area on The Rusty MailBox. It may or may not provide some clarity.. I'm hoping for clarity. :)

    I can crashmail a reply BW packet for your system to you a little later.

    Thanks, I'll keep an eye out.

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-4
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)