Just checking...
Just checking...
Nope. :P
.TZUTC: 0000
.MSGID: 38.fido-fidotest@1:298/25 1ff5b2c6
.PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Linux Aug 26 2018 GCC 7.3.0
.TID: SBBSecho 3.06-Linux r3.92 Aug 26 2018 GCC 7.3.0
Just checking...
--- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
ng.com (1:298/25)
@TZUTC: 0000
@MSGID: 38.fido-fidotest@1:298/25 1ff5b2c6
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Linux Aug 26 2018 GCC
@TID: SBBSecho 3.06-Linux r3.92 Aug 26 2018 GCC 7.3.0
Just checking...
SEEN-BY: 57/0 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 226/100 229/426 240/1661 5832 SEEN-BY: 267/800 280/464 5003 5555 310/31 317/2 3 393/68 423/120
712/848
SEEN-BY: 770/0 1 100 330 340 772/0 1 210 500 2320/100 200
@PATH: 298/25 282/1031 261/38 393/68 770/1 280/464
Hi cr1mson!
Your timezone is wrong.
05 Sep 2018 20:02, from cr1mson -> All:
@TZUTC: 0000
Your timezone is wrong.Some BBSes do intentionally run on UTC. That doesn't necessarily make
@TZUTC: 0000
them "wrong".
@TZUTC: 0000
@MSGID: 38.fido-fidotest@1:298/25 1ff5b2c6
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Linux Aug 26 2018 GCC
@TID: SBBSecho 3.06-Linux r3.92 Aug 26 2018 GCC 7.3.0
@SEEN-BY: 57/0 226/100 267/800 280/464 317/2 3 393/68 770/0 1 100 330 340 @SEEN-BY: 772/0 1 210 500 2320/200
@PATH: 298/25 282/1031 261/38 393/68 770/1
Just checking...
--- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
* Origin: Stepping Stone BBS -- telnet://vintagebbsing.com (1:298/25)
On 09/05/18, cr1mson pondered and said...
Just checking...
Yep :)
@TZUTC: 000015
@MSGID: 38.fido-fidotest@1:298/25 1ff5b2c6
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Linux Aug 26 2018 GCC 7.3.0
@TID: SBBSecho 3.06-Linux r3.92 Aug 26 2018 GCC 7.3.0
Just checking...
--- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
* Origin: Stepping Stone BBS -- telnet://vintagebbsing.com (1:298/25) SEEN-BY: 15/0 19/36 34/999 90/1 116/18 116 120/302 331 123/25 140 150 755 SEEN-BY: 135/300 153/7715 154/10 218/700 220/60 222/2 230/150 152 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 250/1 261/38 100 1466 266/404 512 267/155 275/100 280/1027 282/1031
SEEN-BY: 282/1032 1056 1060 291/1 111 298/25 26 320/119 219 340/400 342/13 SEEN-BY: 393/68 396/45 640/1384 712/848 801/161 189 2320/100 105 3634/12
SEEN-BY: 3634/22 24 27 50 119 666 5020/715 1042
@PATH: 298/25 282/1031 261/38 3634/12
@TZUTC: 0000
06 Sep 2018 17:18, from Jon Justvig -> Paul Hayton:
@TZUTC: 0000
Sorry ... I missed your reply on the timezone setting.
Is your system running with local time?
Yup, not sure about the time zone.@TZUTC: 0000
I haven't ever had a complaint in that department
but you know life, if it's bound to break, it will eventually.
Yup, not sure about the time zone.@TZUTC: 0000
Sorry ... I do not understand.
You do not know what timezone you live in???
You do not know what timezone you live in???
Fidonet isn't what it used to be, Richard. Now, I'm not sure if this
is the case with Jon but some operators tend not to have their own hardware. A lot of fellers have their systems -hosted- elsewhere, sometimes quite remote from where they reside. So there is some frustration as to which TZ might describe where their configuration
is. ;)
*1) With the knowledge that we have now, I say that using local time
for a global medium was a design error. Message and packet headers
should be in UTC. Optionally converted to local time by the reciever.
Yup, not sure about the time zone.@TZUTC: 0000
Sorry ... I do not understand.Fidonet isn't what it used to be, Richard.
You do not know what timezone you live in???
Now, I'm not sure if this is the case with Jon but some operators tend
not to have their own hardware.
A lot of fellers have their systems -hosted- elsewhere,
sometimes quite remote from where they reside.
So there is some frustration as to which TZ might describe where their configuration is. ;)
*1) With the knowledge that we have now, I say that using local
time for a global medium was a design error. Message and packet
headers should be in UTC. Optionally converted to local time by
the reciever.
I think we're in agreement, and we may have talked about this before.
But I have to say that I came from a working environment with a lot of telex traffic. Which meant that each message was timestamped with the then current UTC (GMT) date/time value.
You are missing information that way! I like to know at what local
time a message is written.
It could give some information about the state of mind of the message writer at the time he wrote the message. It's also interesting to know
the time zone of the message writer.
With local time + utc offset, you have all information.
Your software could in theory convert that to UTC if that's your preference, or your own local time...
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495943:58:46 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 287,032 |