If I was running something like ProBoard is there any alternatives to get something working?
QWK networking depends on having a QWK system either built into the BBS or >added on via a door perhaps, it doesn't really matter what type of message >base you use.
In my experience Mystic and MagickaBBS both support QWK natively and use JAM >bases.
Synchronet also supports QWK using the Synchronet message base format.
You went from QWK networking to regular QWK in this reply :)
If he wants to be a node, he might be interested in FidoQWK, which converts QWK packet to PKT files and vice versa. He would still need
and FTN echomail processor.
Why not give SearchLight a try with the Valence QWK mail door, which allows for both QWK hubbing as well as for tossing and scanning
net-status QWK hubs :)
Is searchLight still supported/updated/registerable?
Why not give SearchLight a try with the Valence QWK mail door, which allows for both QWK hubbing as well as for tossing and scanning net-status QWK hubs :)
Is Valence the door that William McBrine wrote? Looks interesting but I know >nothing about SearchLight so my best bet is that is not going to happen.
Is searchLight still supported/updated/registerable?
It's not updated or supported anymore, but if you know where to look,
you can get the key for version 5.1 that allows it to have an
unlimited numbers of users/
It's not updated or supported anymore, but if you know where to look,
you can get the key for version 5.1 that allows it to have an
unlimited numbers of users/
Just ask you. XD
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495937:52:32 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,958 |