Not that anyone was asking for such a feature and I know the Fidonet version of this already exists. But I figured why not use the same
script to implement the feature for other networks as well.
I have setup a means to easily search node lists for these FTN Networks: Fidonet, Gatornet, Agoranet, Retronet, SFNet, and DoRENET.
Not that anyone was asking for such a feature and I know the Fidonet versionof
this already exists. But I figured why not use the same script to implementthe
feature for other networks as well.--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
I have setup a means to easily search node lists for these FTN Networks: Fidonet, Gatornet, Agoranet, Retronet, SFNet, and DoRENET.
You can find it at:
http://nodes.rdnetbbs.com/
--- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
* Origin: RetroDigital BBS - rdnetbbs.com (1:342/11)
Hello, From what I see it looks like there is an issue with the format of your node entry. Probably should talk to whoever you got your node number
1 Apr 2016, nodelist.092: ,11,bbs.RetroDigital.net,Calgary_AB,Michael_Buchholz ,-Unpublished-,33600,XX,CM,IBN
1 Apr 2016, nodelist.092: ,401,Techware_BBS,Los_Angeles_CA,Lee_Green,-Unpublis hed-,300,CM,XA,INA:techware.dynip.com,IBN
Besides the order of the flags, I don't see any significant differences; I'm still on my first cup of coffee, though. Care to elaborate?
Hello, From what I see it looks like there is an issue with the format ofyour
node entry. Probably should talk to whoever you got your node number from. Compare mine to yours.. Mine searches fine and yours does not. I'm sure you can see the differences between the two.--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
1 Apr 2016, nodelist.092: ,11,bbs.RetroDigital.net,Calgary_AB,Michael_Buchholz
,-Unpublished-,33600,XX,CM,IBN
1 Apr 2016, nodelist.092: ,401,Techware_BBS,Los_Angeles_CA,Lee_Green,-Unpublis
hed-,300,CM,XA,INA:techware.dynip.com,IBN
--- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
* Origin: RetroDigital BBS - rdnetbbs.com (1:342/11)
Re: Nodelist search for many networks.of
By: Deepend to LEE GREEN on Sun Dec 17 2017 10:02 pm
Hello, From what I see it looks like there is an issue with the format
numberyour node entry. Probably should talk to whoever you got your node
I'm the RC for Lee's region, most of the nodelist entries are legacy entriesI
inherited.--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
1 Apr 2016, nodelist.092: ,11,bbs.RetroDigital.net,Calgary_AB,Michael_Buchholz ,-Unpublished-,33600,XX,CM,IBN
1 Apr 2016, nodelist.092: ,401,Techware_BBS,Los_Angeles_CA,Lee_Green,-Unpublis hed-,300,CM,XA,INA:techware.dynip.com,IBN
Besides the order of the flags, I don't see any significant differences; I'm
still on my first cup of coffee, though. Care to elaborate?
--- SBBSecho 3.03-Win32
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
Hello, From what I see it looks like there is an issue with the format of your node entry. Probably should talk to whoever you got your nodenumber
from. Compare mine to yours.. Mine searches fine and yours does not. I'm sure you can see the differences between the two.
1 Apr 2016, nodelist.092: ,11,bbs.RetroDigital.net,Calgary_AB,Michael_Buchholz,-Unpublished-,336 00,XX,CM,IBN
1 Apr 2016, nodelist.092: ,401,Techware_BBS,Los_Angeles_CA,Lee_Green,-Unpublished-,300,CM,XA,INA :techware.dynip.com,IBN
My bbs url seems to be in a different position than yours and my bbs
name is where your url is but might be different as it looks like I'm a Host. This is the entry I've had for almost 10 years, everything else seems to work.
what do you think is an issue? everything up to the speed field is fixed order... all the flags after can be in any order... are you perhaps making some
assumptions to the format that are not valid?
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495936:59:31 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,953 |