You just contricted yourself.Dysphoria can be experienced by cis people, and is NOT inherent to being trans.
There's no such thing.MASSIVE cope lmao
Gender Dysphoria is a mental illness.Correct, but you don't understand the data that says the cure is GAC.
And you have only proven our point about Leftoids.
Have you met a transgender person who is not mentally ill? No you have not.
is very easy. Suicide rates among trans are noticeably higher (which in fact is a political point pro-trans politicians use all the time). Here in Spain you don't get issued a firearm permit if you are deemed to be in a noticeably high risk of suicide. So...
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Logic44 <=-
I find it ironic that the people trying to deny gender affirming care
are all on-board with giving military servicemen testosterone
replacement therapy.
There's a large difference between treating a man with testosterone and trying to turn a woman into a man by injecting her with testosterone.
But facts and Leftoids don't mix.
... You can close your eyes to reality but not to memories.
Straw Man argument. No one claims that everything that happens in
politics is anti-gay/trans, but when you have a document like Projecrt
but when you have a document like Projecrt
2025 which our administration is following to the letter (and had the
author in the administration) it's pretty safe to say that LGBTQ+
rights are in jeopardy.
Arelor wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Only if you can back the notion that disphoria is not an illness (against the arguments provided in this thread).
Not according to DSM-5.
If your premise that transgender people are mentally ill is flawed,
your argument fails.
What's flawed?
XX=female
XY=male
It's called science. The rest is mental bullshit!
DSM-5 doesn't call transgender a mental illness. If you want to, go
ahead.
If it told the truth it wouldn't get published because of people like you.
It is not a strawman argument at all. A significant number of people I deal with seem to think every little thing the government does is specifically designed to target them. Which is bonkers.
so you have no problem with a grown man wearing a wig going into a public Change room and showing your daughter his penis? Would you defend his rights?
It seems like something that will improve america. We need this. lgbtqabcdefg rights are not in danger. they get human rights like everyone Else.
Nightfox wrote to Dr. What <=-
What does reapplying for a driver's license entail (in some states)?
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
Dysphoria can be experienced by cis people, and is NOT inherent to
being trans.
MASSIVE cope lmao
Correct, but you don't understand the data that says the cure is GAC.
MRO wrote to Dr. What <=-
just when i think poindexter is a complete moron he tops himself a thousand Fold. It's hard to believe he's a person and not a bot.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Arelor <=-
Straw Man argument. No one claims that everything that happens in
politics is anti-gay/trans, but when you have a document like Projecrt
2025 which our administration is following to the letter (and had the
author in the administration) it's pretty safe to say that LGBTQ+
rights are in jeopardy.
Logic44 wrote to MRO <=-
Medical care has been taken,
the right to use the correct bathroom,
as I said earlier, this administration DID try to take away our 2nd amendment right.
If you can't actually engage, stop typing...
What's flawed?
XX=female
XY=male
It's called science. The rest is mental bullshit!
DSM-5 doesn't call transgender a mental illness. If you want to, go
ahead.
"cis" is a made up word with no meaning.Damn, guess I should tell the people who came up with LATIN that they're just bullshitting.
No, it's called "Reality". I know how leftoids hate Reality.What reality?
No such data exists.It does.
But, then, I understand that you can only take the word of the "experts" (you know, the ones who are out, standing in their fields) as opposed to thinking for yourself and seeing for yourself.Yeah, because most people ADMIT when they don't know shit instead of making it up.
If all you are going to do is quote the false
Narrative of your hive mind, stop posting.
Incorrect since they are attempting to use a physical medical procedure to correct a mental illness.Because that's what's proven to cure it.
Incorrect. A mentally ill man has no right to use the woman's bathroom.What man? We aren't talking about men.
Incorrect again. The laws prohibiting the mentally ill from owning guns has been on the books for decades.Gender dysphoria is NOT inherent to being trans. ***************************************
What does reapplying for a driver's license entail (in some states)?
They have to actually go a Secretary of State office as opposed to doing it via mail.
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
"cis" is a made up word with no meaning.
Damn, guess I should tell the people who came up with LATIN that
they're just bullshitting.
No, it's called "Reality". I know how leftoids hate Reality.
What reality?
No such data exists.
It does.
Yeah, because most people ADMIT when they don't know shit instead of making it up.
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
Ah, the false narrative known as Project 2025, totally not the playbook for this whole admin...
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
Incorrect since they are attempting to use a physical medical procedure to correct a mental illness.
Because that's what's proven to cure it.
Incorrect. A mentally ill man has no right to use the woman's bathroom.
What man? We aren't talking about men.
Incorrect again. The laws prohibiting the mentally ill from owning guns has been on the books for decades.
Gender dysphoria is NOT inherent to being trans.
Nightfox wrote to Dr. What <=-
I didn't even know a driver's license could be renewed by mail until
the last time I renewed mine several years ago.. Previously, I'd
always had to go in person, and they'd take a new photo of me. The
last time, I saw that you could fill out a form online and they just mailed me my new one with my previous photo on it.
A "trans-woman" is a mentally ill man. So, yes, we are talking about men. Reality, remember?
Doing a quick search for "Project 2025" and I see lots of Leftist web sites saying how bad it is.
Which is just proof that it's a good thing.
MRO wrote to Dr. What <=-
just when i think poindexter is a complete moron he tops himself a thousand Fold. It's hard to believe he's a person and not a bot.
He is a bot. Just a flesh one. He sits in front of his TV every morning and > is told what to think for the day.
No such proof exists. The medical community has already admitted that.
You mean the DSM-5 from 2013?
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
And that, kids, is an example of what the word "Echochamber" means...
A "trans-woman" is a mentally ill man. So, yes, we are talking aboutmen.
Reality, remember?
That's YOUR reality, not actual, scientific reality.
The projection! Wow. I'd forgotten how much the Leftoids project.
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
Re: Re: Trans 2a
By: Dr. What to Logic44 on Sat Jul 25 2026 07:46:00
The projection! Wow. I'd forgotten how much the Leftoids project.
My guy, you literally said "It's good because you guys said it was bad" without even reading further into it, that's not projection, that's
just a fact about you that you don't like.
I ride SOLO.
And what science are you talking about?
Yeah, I bet.
Logic44 wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Trans 2a
By: Gamgee to Logic44 on Sat Jul 25 2026 13:50:33
Yeah, I bet.
I love it when mfs say shit like this, because it isn't always
projection, but the amount of times it has been is way less than zero.
Every so often I'll send an exchange like this to my bf, he finds it
just as dumb as I do...
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/trgh.2023.0087 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2789423 https:/ /journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/gox.0000000000006911~an-assessm ent-of-the-longitudinal-impact-of-gender-affirming?context=latestarticles
I think the best part about this is that I can keep finding these, and I get new, different search results almost every fuckin time lmao
There's certainly no shortage of bullshit on the internet...
Bf2k+ wrote to Logic44 <=-
There's certainly no shortage of bullshit on the internet...
Anyways, you gonna read them and admit you're wrong, or not?
That's always been the case. But now we have to deal with propaganda too.
I prefer to laugh at your idiocy...
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's always been the case. But now we have to deal with propaganda too.
Scientific journals are propaganda?
Sounds like you should take a propaganda at it, buddy.
Bf2k+ wrote to Logic44 <=-
Anyways, you gonna read them and admit you're wrong, or not?
I prefer to laugh at your idiocy...
For those of us with a working brain, we discovered long ago that "science" got corrupted by the Left. Too many "scientific" papers come out with a clear bias and blatently ignore evidence that they don't agree with.
That's usually the best. Those people have been fully vaccinated against facts - especially ones that go against their false Narrative.
Related to the "debate" at hand:
https://stonetoss.com/comic/monkey-paw/
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
So you're just anti-intellectual and can't debate, got it...
If your position were correct, there'd be evidence by now, you're just wrong.
Wow. The projection is infinite from Leftoids.
And the complete lack of self-awareness.
There's piles of evidence that I am correct.
The problem is that your filter won't let you see it because it would prove you wrong. And Leftoids can never be wrong.
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
Who's the one denying evidence?
You don't seem to understand the difference between Propaganda and Evidence.100% projection, you project and then say I'M projecting?
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
Who's the one denying evidence?
You don't seem to understand the difference between Propaganda and Evidence.
But that's not a surprise since you have no critical thinking skills and the TV didn't tell you to think that way today.
... To know the road ahead, ask those coming back.
I read an interesting theory the other day and actually had a bit of a debate with some guys at work. The article went on to explain that trans is considered a birth defect. I thought hmmm. I guess I mean, the argument is such that biologically we are designed to pro create and have very distinguished gender roles. I'm still trying to wrap my head around this.. has anyone else heard about this theory or proposition?
Darkman Almighty wrote to Dr. What <=-
I read an interesting theory the other day and actually had a bit of a debate with some guys at work. The article went on to explain that
trans is considered a birth defect.
I haven't heard that one. It seems like they are working to make "trans" a physical illness rather than the mental illness that it is. I guess they need to deflect blame away from their operatives in the schools that push children toward getting their healthy body parts chopped off.
Now, I have seen some work on homosexuality being tied to the wide-spread use of birth control pills (there's a unintentional pun in there). No "smoking gun" on that yet, but the evidence so far seems to point that way. Imagine being delusional enough to think that trans adults don't grow up from being trans kids...
Re: Re: Trans 2a
By: Darkman Almighty to Dr. What on Sun Aug 02 2026 13:33:00
I read an interesting theory the other day and actually had a bit of a debate with some guys at work. The article went on to explain that tran considered a birth defect. I thought hmmm. I guess I mean, the argument such that biologically we are designed to pro create and have very distinguished gender roles. I'm still trying to wrap my head around thi has anyone else heard about this theory or proposition?
Do you have a link to that? It sounds kinda odd.
I think it's as much of a birth defect as being born intersex, as in, it barely qualifies as one.
Trans people are able to procreate, so I don't see what you're getting
at. Sure, trans women can't get pregnant, but trans men can... ***************************************
Logic44, Sysop of LNRC Indiana Boards
board.lnrcbbs.net, ports 22,23,513,64,128
Weather in Indiana: SUCKS
***************************************
---
I don't have the link no. I won't pretend to be an expert subject matter here but yes trans can have kids. I think theres just so many variations that its not clear. A colleague in my office is a woman trans to man and recently married a woman who I also work with. Ive known the two of them for years. When he was a she, she was married to a trans man(woman). I suppose if the genitalia lines up you have a baby making ability... they did not. What I had trouble understanding was you were a woman and like men but in the new scenario they are now a man and with a woman. Vaginas a common theme here. I'm not sure I want to label him as having a birth defect and I'm not sure about some mental condition either. It's def confusing for me as I'm sure it is for others.
Logic44 wrote to Darkman Almighty <=-
Your sexuality might change based on where you are in your transition. Some people who were dating men pre-transition might date women post-transition. Shit just happens sometimes, humans are odd.
We're only just now starting to understand how brains work, or at least
we have a much better understanding than before...
We're only just now starting to understand how brains work, or at least
we have a much better understanding than before...
Ummm, have to disagree there. The brain has been well-understood for decades, at least. When is "before"?
| Sysop: | Winzlo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Minnesota, USA |
| Users: | 11 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495931:57:35 |
| Calls: | 82 |
| Files: | 1,070 |
| D/L today: |
27 files (11,920K bytes) |
| Messages: | 286,898 |